Brooks report, terms of lease/sub lease say that, under the current ownership and terms, the land must be used for football/sport.
By virtue of that, the club are on the land currently, it cant be used for anything else.
That's the point I am making. As long as the club are there, and the terms of the land/lease are the same, the land cant be used. It may not be the club directly stopping it, but the club and the terms etc, are.
You appear to just like to argue.