Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
Well if you wanted to simply regurgitate inaccurate and self-contradictory soundbites about what Labour stands for, why didn’t you just do that instead of asking me to justify positions that I don’t hold on electoral bribery? It would have been a lot easier, don’t you think? Why waste both our time?

In getting all waspish and hot under the collar, you miss obvious points. For example, in a society in which self-reliance is to the fore, the danger is that those who cannot, for whatever reason, be self-reliant are at risk of being left behind. In addition, in a society in which the state is too small, there is a risk that the tools that people need to advance themselves might not be readily available to some.

Try those for size rather than coming out with Momentum generated babble.
Just correcting you old lad by using normal, impartial, non loaded definitions of Labour's 'natural position' seeing as you weren't able to maintain any sense of objectivity.

Momentum? That definition is from SimplePolitics.com, which has nice, simple, clear political definitions for children. Their conservative definition was pretty similar to your own, I'm sure you would approve. But your Labour definition, that you posted without any prompting or provocation would be unfit for the consumption of eager children willing to learn political definition.

Too blatantly biased towards the conservatives you see.

But you don't vote for them. Of course.