Quote Originally Posted by ragingpup View Post
Just correcting you old lad by using normal, impartial, non loaded definitions of Labour's 'natural position' seeing as you weren't able to maintain any sense of objectivity.

Momentum? That definition is from SimplePolitics.com, which has nice, simple, clear political definitions for children. Their conservative definition was pretty similar to your own, I'm sure you would approve. But your Labour definition, that you posted without any prompting or provocation would be unfit for the consumption of eager children willing to learn political definition.

Too blatantly biased towards the conservatives you see.

But you don't vote for them. Of course.
I confess that I'm not sure what to make of all that.

I could be harsh and say that the fact that you are taking your politics from a site that you think suitable for children and your final sentence says something about you, but that would only risk upsetting you further.

I'm not sure where the 'prompting and provocation' comment came from. I told you what I thought without checking Wikipedia, child friendly sites or Momentum 'what to think and say' output. As far as I can see, you don't disagree with what I said, but are upset that I said it and are falling back on child suitable, inaccurate and self-contradictory definitions of what Labour stands for.

I have voted in every GE since 1983 and have never voted Tory.