O/T Democracy

[rolymiller]

Can't wait to buy this book: "How to win friends and influence people" by Kerr Avon. You are a card...thats not to say i disagree with all you say but you sure know how to wind people up the wrong way.

[rolymiller]

At the risk of spoiling the joke, I have to observe that the ECJ has no jurisdiction on matters of British constitutional law.

Flippin eck that was my joke. It took me ages to think of it and now you tell me they have no influence on English Law.

Want a clapped out polo by the way. 600 smackers to you as a big buddy...

[animallittle3]

Are you for real? So everyone knew why Boris did what he did but where is your proof? Other than an assumption what proof do you have?

The law deals in proof not hearsay or at least it did before today's events.

Whilst I understand Johnson's sentiment he's sailing very close to the wind in my opinion .

If the highest court in the land declares he's misled the queen and parliament then he's misled the queen and parliament and that's that .

The problem now is that parliament and the remainers have gained the moral high ground and he managed to unite the opposition party's and who knows how many enemy's he's made in his own party .

Whilst ever leave could bang the democracy drumb and rightly claim we are leaving then Johnson comes along and gifts them the initiative by acting undemocratic and now the highest court in the land says he is .

Who knows where we go from here .

[KerrAvon]

My god man you are a total and utter nutter. The case was brought to the courts on the premise that Boris lied to the queen which is what they have given a verdict of guilty on.

I hope this is what all you antidemocratic people wanted because you have now given the law full power over any political decision that will be made from now on.

Good luck to Corbyn if he thinks he is going to get that £10 an hour living wage to pass Parliament and the law. Even if parliament do pass that law it could now be taken to the courts by the rich business men and women who will find a reason to not abide by it.

Your vote will never ever count for anything again in your lifetime or even your children or grandchildren. You and any remoaners who have backed this result or who are harpy about it will pay the price big time so well done muppets.

I know that you won't accept it, Biggie and I am not going to engage you in a WanChai style circular argument, but you are plain, vanilla wrong on this.

The government declined to provide any evidence to the court upon the reason for proroguation. The court had to decide if it had jurisdiction in the matter and then whether the government had acted reasonably and rationally. In the absence of any evidence from the government, the court was entitled to draw its own conclusions.

[KerrAvon]

Flippin eck that was my joke. It took me ages to think of it and now you tell me they have no influence on English Law.

Want a clapped out polo by the way. 600 smackers to you as a big buddy...

600 that you could give to victims of Socialism in Venezuela along with the tax and insurance that you pay...

No, I didn't think so.

[rolymiller]

Good luck with that one Biglad, once he has his teeth in your ankles he waint let go...trust me...He does have a point though

[rolymiller]

I thought you might like me to look after the victims of socialism

[BigLadonOS]

Whilst I understand Johnson's sentiment he's sailing very close to the wind in my opinion .

If the highest court in the land declares he's misled the queen and parliament then he's misled the queen and parliament and that's that .

The problem now is that parliament and the remainers have gained the moral high ground and he managed to unite the opposition party's and who knows how many enemy's he's made in his own party .

Whilst ever leave could bang the democracy drumb and rightly claim we are leaving then Johnson comes along and gifts them the initiative by acting undemocratic and now the highest court in the land says he is .

Who knows where we go from here .

It is not anti democratic to give parliament what it wanted, it had been saying for months that a new queens speech was needed and that an Election was warranted and all Boris did was do what had been called for and suddenly because the people who had called for it decided that the time for an election was not politically good for them they had the law fight their battle for them.

[mikemiller]

Think Kerr is upset that the Tory Party is in disarray, and their leader has disgraced himself. Kerr doesn't seem to know much about history or politics though. Tony Blair was a lawyer and he didn't either

[rolymiller]

I can't actually remember any of that from Boris Biglad but maybe I missed it...

Boris has indeed disgraced himself but Kerr does not do criticising the tory party. Now the Labour party that's different...