+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Richard Keogh: Derby County sack captain for 'gross misconduct'

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Silly-miller View Post
    Never said it did make sense

    I guess club is probably thinking he was thinking straight when he got in the car with a drunk driver and should have known better.

    Personally I think all 3 should be sacked with a 3 year ban from football

    They offered him reduced wages but he refused so they sacked him for refusing a pay cut, now his lawyers are fighting his sacking
    He doesn’t drive and wasn’t wearing a seat belt so he’s an idiot

    Did he not drink? The three were at the bar when others had left

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    4,924
    Quote Originally Posted by millertop View Post
    He doesn’t drive and wasn’t wearing a seat belt so he’s an idiot

    Did he not drink? The three were at the bar when others had left
    Don’t know if he drank or not but tbh there’s rumours that he stayed to watch the other two but tbh it doesn’t matter he wasn’t driving. It make derby look bad tbh they look like they will over look criminals so long as they can play

    I don’t have a police report just know what my dad reads on his fan page and dcfc news

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    5,667

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    5,667
    All 3 are as bad as each other. Keogh is the oldest, the most injured and the least valuable.

    Derby are a ****ehouse of a club and should’ve either sacked all 3 or kept all 3.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    4,924
    Quote Originally Posted by Scum-Triumphant View Post
    All 3 are as bad as each other. Keogh is the oldest, the most injured and the least valuable.

    Derby are a ****ehouse of a club and should’ve either sacked all 3 or kept all 3.
    Well I can’t argue with that

    Lesson of the day don’t listen to ya dads half assed reading powers lol

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    11,751
    Understandably there's been lots of conjecture following the sacking of Richard Keogh - with many questioning why the club captain has been sacked, yet Mason Bennett and Tom Lawrence have kept their jobs.

    It's understood several factors counted against Keogh. He was the club captain, a senior player and it was felt he should have taken more responsibility on the night in question. These reasons, coupled with a serious injury sustained through a non-football activity, are why the club have felt it necessary to terminate Keogh's contract.

    We almost certainly haven't heard the last of this, with Keogh expected to appeal against the decision.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    3,726
    The free market at work.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    29,516
    I wasn't aware that fully grown men earning what they earn needed a baby sitter.

  9. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by flourbasher View Post
    Understandably there's been lots of conjecture following the sacking of Richard Keogh - with many questioning why the club captain has been sacked, yet Mason Bennett and Tom Lawrence have kept their jobs.

    It's understood several factors counted against Keogh. He was the club captain, a senior player and it was felt he should have taken more responsibility on the night in question. These reasons, coupled with a serious injury sustained through a non-football activity, are why the club have felt it necessary to terminate Keogh's contract.

    We almost certainly haven't heard the last of this, with Keogh expected to appeal against the decision.
    I would have thought that all football clubs (inc RUFC) have contract clauses that require players not to undertake activities that can cause injury, ie hang gliding, playing amateur rugby etc. Whilst getting drunk and crashing cars is an extreme example of "putting self at risk" it would probably still let the club punish Keogh in this way.

    However, not applying the same rule to their other two players seems to be an indication that there's playing time left in them where Keogh hasn't.

    But hey. it's football, all about money not fairness

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •