Keogh sacked

[MadAmster]

Best to stick to the known facts which means that, at this moment, we have no idea why they saw fit to give RK a choice between a 50% drop in wages or the sack. We also do't know why the other 4 involved are still involved or even still at the club. It may come out in the future, it may not. We shall have to wait and see.

January may prove to be a month in which a lot becomes crystal clear.

[swaledale]

Best to stick to the known facts which means that, at this moment, we have no idea why they saw fit to give RK a choice between a 50% drop in wages or the sack. We also do't know why the other 4 involved are still involved or even still at the club. It may come out in the future, it may not. We shall have to wait and see.

January may prove to be a month in which a lot becomes crystal clear.

Thats the issue though, the clubs statement as to why doesn't actually make sense, other than the other two players are fincial and playing assets and it would disadvantage the club to apply the same approach to them as they have with keogh, much better if they had not put that statement out in relation to sacking Keogh.

It also does not make sense to offer half his salary, either you sack someone for gross misconduct or you apply another sanction. Anyway I'm sure Keogh will respond legally and if that ends in "an agreed settlement" (these things hardly ever get to court for various reasons, we will still be none the wiser.