Quote Originally Posted by MillerBill View Post
What is the point of these TV debates on the election, when the audience is filled with remoaners.The ITV last night showed once again,they are just as bad as the others.No applause for leaver representatives but enthusiastic for remoaners.It really is pathetic that these people speak up for the Islington London bubble crowd and not the majority of the population.Before that we had the remainiac Marr constantly talking over the Prime Minister's answers and interupting all of the time.It was like Marr interview Marr.Yet there was very little interuption for remoaners answers, when they were questioned.So biased it's unbelievable and the voters are getting wise to this fake broadcating.
For me, it just seemed that the Remain based parties made the better arguments more forcefully. Farage very poor, normally better than this but obviously he has his Conservative deal to protect

As for Marr, I think that he was simply responding to the fact that Johnson wasn't actually answering the questions, but spinning his own interpretation of the questions so that he could get his sound bites in. A more forceful interviewer wouldn't let him get away with it. Marr realised he was only getting spin so wanted to move on in the little time he had. The problem for non Tories is that such an approach to interviewers (ignoring questions and simply saying what you want to say) can sound ok if you say it forcefully enough and the interviewer isn't strong enough to pin you down and embarrass you with the tactic. Hence, we won't go on Andrew Neill