+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 22 of 35 FirstFirst ... 12202122232432 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 345

Thread: O/T:- Are we over-reacting to COVD19?

  1. #211
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    35,943
    Quote Originally Posted by the_anticlough View Post
    Read this from the chair of global public health at the University of Edinburgh.

    A damning analysis of how the Government has fcuked this up.
    I think it's still too early to make a definitive judgement on the way the government has handled this. Looking at other countries, if we can keep the daily fatalities at or close to double figures as the peak, they have done a decent job. If in the coming weeks the death rate rises to similar numbers as Italy and Spain, they have failed big time. I hope I'm wrong, but I think the big mistake so far was 'advising' rather than 'enforcing'. Even if 90% of people take the advice on board, it still leaves millions who don't. My concern is that the actions we are now taking are a couple of weeks behind when they should have been taken.

  2. #212
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    2,241
    Quote Originally Posted by Elite_Pie View Post
    I think it's still too early to make a definitive judgement on the way the government has handled this. Looking at other countries, if we can keep the daily fatalities at or close to double figures as the peak, they have done a decent job. If in the coming weeks the death rate rises to similar numbers as Italy and Spain, they have failed big time. I hope I'm wrong, but I think the big mistake so far was 'advising' rather than 'enforcing'. Even if 90% of people take the advice on board, it still leaves millions who don't. My concern is that the actions we are now taking are a couple of weeks behind when they should have been taken.
    A fair analysis Elite.

  3. #213
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    18,918
    Going by the graphs, it looks as though we'll be very similar to Italy, the hardest hit will be Spain. USA will likely be the worst hit of all in the developed world.
    Seeing the pictures still being tweeted from passengers on the tube trains, I can't understand why those haven't been closed altogether. You'd expect London to be the hardest hit but the tube situation is madness.

  4. #214
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    13,571
    Quote Originally Posted by Elite_Pie View Post
    I think it's still too early to make a definitive judgement on the way the government has handled this. Looking at other countries, if we can keep the daily fatalities at or close to double figures as the peak, they have done a decent job. If in the coming weeks the death rate rises to similar numbers as Italy and Spain, they have failed big time. I hope I'm wrong, but I think the big mistake so far was 'advising' rather than 'enforcing'. Even if 90% of people take the advice on board, it still leaves millions who don't. My concern is that the actions we are now taking are a couple of weeks behind when they should have been taken.
    An interesting hypothetical question is how a Jeremy Corbyn government would have handled the same situation?

    The obvious thing to say is that a Corbyn Government would have thrown a lot of money at it, but then again Rishi Sunak has done that too and surprised a lot of people, so it's a question of whether Corbyn would have thrown even more at the problem.

    The other question I suppose is whether he would have restricted civil liberties to a greater degree than the current Government. Corbyn isn't exactly a 'police state' guy to say the least, but would he have been hardline or softly softly? Would he have had the nation in lockdown already, or would he be trying to sit down and negotiate with the virus?

  5. #215
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,976
    Quote Originally Posted by jackal2 View Post
    An interesting hypothetical question is how a Jeremy Corbyn government would have handled the same situation?

    The obvious thing to say is that a Corbyn Government would have thrown a lot of money at it, but then again Rishi Sunak has done that too and surprised a lot of people, so it's a question of whether Corbyn would have thrown even more at the problem.

    The other question I suppose is whether he would have restricted civil liberties to a greater degree than the current Government. Corbyn isn't exactly a 'police state' guy to say the least, but would he have been hardline or softly softly? Would he have had the nation in lockdown already, or would he be trying to sit down and negotiate with the virus?
    I think a Corbyn government would have been terrible. Probably quicker to address economic need, but even more incompetent.

    This crisis is an illustration of the truly awful choice the public has been faced with at the last 2 elections.

  6. #216
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    35,943
    Quote Originally Posted by jackal2 View Post
    An interesting hypothetical question is how a Jeremy Corbyn government would have handled the same situation?
    He would have made all the right decisions in the interest of the public rather than business, and kept fatalities to an absolute minimum.

    While I don't believe that for a minute, it's no less valid than any claims that it would be ten times worse if he was in charge.

  7. #217
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    2,241
    Quote Originally Posted by Elite_Pie View Post
    He would have made all the right decisions in the interest of the public rather than business, and kept fatalities to an absolute minimum.

    While I don't believe that for a minute, it's no less valid than any claims that it would be ten times worse if he was in charge.
    Again a fair assessment Elite.

  8. #218
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    31,954
    Quote Originally Posted by forwardmagpie View Post
    Again a fair assessment Elite.

    Agree with most of the above. While Boris has followed the medical advice, asking rather nicely is not the same as ordering people to follow recommendations or else. Seems he's done that now, ought to have been done a week or so ago.

  9. #219
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    13,571
    Quote Originally Posted by Elite_Pie View Post
    He would have made all the right decisions in the interest of the public rather than business, and kept fatalities to an absolute minimum.

    While I don't believe that for a minute, it's no less valid than any claims that it would be ten times worse if he was in charge.
    To be fair I think most British Governments in recent history would have had a big dilemma, because the "big stick" approach isn't really compatible with western liberal democracies, and especially not the British mentality.

    When China gave out strict instructions to their public, they did so in the knowledge that their people are trained from birth to do as they are told, but the western culture is different. It will be interesting to see how the new measures just announced are enforced.

  10. #220
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    18,918
    In this situation, Corbyn would have been battling against the media as well as the virus, he wouldn't have stood a chance because the public and businesses wouldn't have been encouraged, or worse been actively discouraged, to comply with the governments advice until it was too late. I can see the Sun headlines now, "Corbyn-19 wants to close our pubs" with his face superimposed onto a graphic of the virus.

Page 22 of 35 FirstFirst ... 12202122232432 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •