+ Visit Dundee United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 11 of 48 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 474

Thread: Dundee United - Championship winners 2019/20

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    4,033
    Quote Originally Posted by utd4me View Post
    If the deadline is 17:00 and that has passed, why are we still waiting on whoever to vote. Or have they voted and and it hasn't been received yet.
    Someone has said on BBC website that the real deadline is 28 days

    ICT might be holding out to see if they can get more reassurances on league reconstruction

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,403
    Quote Originally Posted by LSArab View Post
    Someone has said on BBC website that the real deadline is 28 days

    ICT might be holding out to see if they can get more reassurances on league reconstruction

    Can’t be if they set a 5pm deadline surely, if 28 days, hardly any would have voted, and we wouldn’t be expecting an update for 28 days.

  3. #103
    The boy fae STV Raman Bhardwaj saying clubs have 28 days to cast their vote, nae deadline

    FFS SFA

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13,783
    5pm was apparently just a 'request'.

    What an absolute ****ing shambles.

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,403
    Quote Originally Posted by offshore_arab83 View Post
    The boy fae STV Raman Bhardwaj saying clubs have 28 days to cast their vote, nae deadline

    FFS SFA
    How fecking inept are our association FFS, but if that is the case, why did so many vote so quickly???

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,502
    It’s got to be ICT. Wouldn’t be surprised If they’ve held off deliberately in order to engineer exactly this sort of situation where they can now hold all the aces. Stand by for more negotiations between the SPFL and ICT over the weekend over potential reconstruction proposals before they’re prepared to give it the yes.

    Contrary to some on Funster Mad, we are not looking for a ‘gimme’. We are/were wanting the games played. We wanted a day of celebration and relief at the end of this nonsense. But for a variety of reasons it is clear that this is not going to be happening. Given that, no way are we accepting any null and void pish when we are blatantly going up otherwise. The behaviour of the Funster owners over the last couple of days should not be forgotten. Especially by the landlord of Dens.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,502
    Quote Originally Posted by GUNBOAT View Post
    My Dens Park mole tells me that Nelms was too busy making up statements and forgot to vote.
    That made me laugh out loud GB. Especially as you couldn’t totally discount it.

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    4,033
    Quote Originally Posted by JamesMcClean View Post
    It’s got to be ICT. Wouldn’t be surprised If they’ve held off deliberately in order to engineer exactly this sort of situation where they can now hold all the aces. Stand by for more negotiations between the SPFL and ICT over the weekend over potential reconstruction proposals before they’re prepared to give it the yes.

    Contrary to some on Funster Mad, we are not looking for a ‘gimme’. We are/were wanting the games played. We wanted a day of celebration and relief at the end of this nonsense. But for a variety of reasons it is clear that this is not going to be happening. Given that, no way are we accepting any null and void pish when we are blatantly going up otherwise. The behaviour of the Funster owners over the last couple of days should not be forgotten. Especially by the landlord of Dens.
    Just to recap on the apparent Fun positions

    1. We are voting No because we want promotion.

    2. Lodge a proposal (with no support from other clubs) that there should be no promotion

    3. Put out a confused statement saying they voted No because clubs are losing £4M from ending the season early ?!?

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,403
    Quote Originally Posted by LSArab View Post
    Just to recap on the apparent Fun positions

    1. We are voting No because we want promotion.

    2. Lodge a proposal (with no support from other clubs) that there should be no promotion

    3. Put out a confused statement saying they voted No because clubs are losing £4M from ending the season early ?!?
    The only thing they’ve lost, is ALL FECKING CREDIBILITY, not that they had much in the first place. DESPICABLE CLUB!!

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    438
    What a bunch sad f*****g losers across the road trying come up with any way to stop us going up as need us to fill that s**t hole of a ground. If we don't get up boycott that place on derby day and see them in mid table trying to fill it on their own.

Page 11 of 48 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •