+ Visit Newcastle United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: how long to compete

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    11,075
    I think and I maybe wrong that some people must be slightly disappointed with our new owners - they have said that they will take a back seat . this takeover looks more like a investment for them more than love of football .Consider they are investing their money all over the place - carnival cruises for one and it seems they are trying to buy timewarner - in otherwords they have a lot of irons in a lot of fires so football is just another one - consider man city , their owner appears at the matches , owns other clubs so seems to be into football

    personally and it is my opinion only I think Amanda will be given a lump sum every year and she or whoever will decide how it is spent . Quite conceivably a lot of initial investment could be spent on infrastucture and some on players who will give us a cast iron team that doesn't spend the season looking at the bottom of the league

    Of course it's my view and would gladly think it would be nice to be wrong though I still think its a good move for the club

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,308
    Quote Originally Posted by ronandtet View Post
    I think and I maybe wrong that some people must be slightly disappointed with our new owners - they have said that they will take a back seat . this takeover looks more like a investment for them more than love of football .Consider they are investing their money all over the place - carnival cruises for one and it seems they are trying to buy timewarner - in otherwords they have a lot of irons in a lot of fires so football is just another one - consider man city , their owner appears at the matches , owns other clubs so seems to be into football

    personally and it is my opinion only I think Amanda will be given a lump sum every year and she or whoever will decide how it is spent . Quite conceivably a lot of initial investment could be spent on infrastucture and some on players who will give us a cast iron team that doesn't spend the season looking at the bottom of the league

    Of course it's my view and would gladly think it would be nice to be wrong though I still think its a good move for the club
    The main difference between them and Ashley is they will not be a selling club and will give a manager time to build a decent team.Ashley could not resist selling because that's the business he has always been in.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •