If there was no local alternative child support and he could get to Durham without stopping at services, I have no problem.
Where I do have a problem is when he claims to be having trouble with his eyesight and drives a car to test it, unbelievable.
Also, I could accept the test drive to assess his fitness to drive the 5 hour journey BUT he should have driven laps on local roads for an hour, so that he was never more than a couple of miles away, in case he was took ill
You don't drive one direction 30 miles away.
Let's face it, he went on a jolly with the family, which was clearly in breach of guidelines at the time.
Trouble is with sacking him, would any of these reasons be enough, at a tribunal?
[QUOTE=MadAmster;39501364]I think any parent can get their head around the idea of someone "doing what's best for a child". Having said that, nobody involved has explained why the wife's sister, 2 miles down the road, apparently, wasn't a viable option..... and even that would have been against the government's instructions.
You keep on about the wife's sister down the road, but she may be an alcoholic psychopath or may need to be shielded or someone in the household could be in a similar position.
You would hardly be expected to volunteer such information.
Only one talking bollox here sunshine, put your red blinkers back on if you wish.
https://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presente...minic-cumming/
No idea whether the Guardian covered it or not. Probably did.
Neither am I sure which bit of ‘seems ridiculous and equally wrong’ you don’t understand.
I do recognise ‘deflection’ when I see it though, so on a thread entitled ‘Cummings Press Statement’ should we stick to that?
Then if you want to start a similar thread about ‘Ali Funeral Statement’ that’s up to you.
In the meantime...when someone helps design a slogan telling everyone to ‘Stay at Home’, ‘Protect the NHS’, ‘Save Lives’, maybe, just maybe, he should abide by it, and reconsider the wisdom of - while allegedly suffering from Covid-19 - travelling 260 miles to his elderly parents farm because his wife had thrown up and he didn’t feel very well, and then going for a thirty mile jaunt to a local beauty spot to sit by the river and check his eyesight.![]()
RA, i concur with a lot about what you've said. But why just Cummings?
You do not have to explain to me what he did. I know and don't agree with it. Some can/will argue his reasons were valid.
I don't.
But there is a bigger picture here and all I see is a witch hunt. Technically, he did nothing wrong. Moralistically, yes he did.
But there is a delight in hounding him, with the ommitence of every other offender going.
Even Kinnock, he travelled because it was his dads birthday? Good reason? I don't think so.
Sorry, but it smacks of axe to grind.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Lc86JUAwwg
Tricky, I don’t care who they go after. If people broke the rules that’s their problem and I speak as someone who missed one of my son’s ‘landmark’ birthdays recently because I followed the rules.
In Kinnock’s case it seems he journeyed to his father’s home and socially distanced in the front garden. He was wrong, but he didn’t believe he had Coronavirus and he didn’t make any secret of it. Neither, as an opposition MP, was he a fundamental part of the rule/slogan making process.
We’re going round and round in circles and frankly it’s become very boring, but I’ll just add this point of information.
This afternoon I had cause to drive through Matlock Bath and to Chatsworth. The obvious question at both places was ‘lockdown...what lockdown?’
I don’t know to what extent the two are linked, but I suspect Cummings’ behaviour has left people thinking that if the ‘elite’ don’t have to stay at home or alert then neither do they.