Quote Originally Posted by Deeranged View Post
***uality has nothing whatsoever to do with gender so the idea that hetero***ual can be a gender is fundamentally flawed.

Scientifically there are two genders - male and female - based on the allocation of X and Y chromosomes at the point of conception which assigns the development of genitalia, other reproductive organs and certain physical traits. However, biology can sometimes throw up a 'controversial' individual that may have the genitalia of both or neither gender in which case it can be difficult to designate a gender but does not in itself constitute a third, fourth or whatever gender. This is in most rational people's minds the only way to recognise gender.

***uality is something that can be taught, preferred or forced upon someone as well as a natural feeling and this is the problem with society. Hetero***ual is the biological preference as, in all honesty, we exist for one reason and one reason only and that is to perpetuate the species. This requires reproduction which is only possible by the combination of genes from both genders.

The concept of homo***uality is against nature but in a free thinking species and society not in itself wrong, indeed it has been observed in other species than humans; however this tends to be in response to the need for companionship and / or security rather than the drive to reproduce. Unfortunately the human capacity to think for oneself, possibly aligned to the tendency for society to tolerate pretty much anything, means it's now possible to simply say you identify your ***uality as a red dog with big hairy *******s and you must be accepted as a red dog with big hairy *******s.

In short, gender is assigned at conception, ***uality is not.
You would not be allowed to express the above post as a teacher or a pupil.

That is what I am against......as you may have guessed.