What was the point of Kazim-Richards?

[swaledale]

I’ve said what I think, Swale...no point in criticising someone who hasn’t had a chance to prove themselves. I also know where arguing with you over something like this leads and I’m not going there.
Great finish in the cricket...magnificent finish to the RL season...just hope we can make it 3/3 tomorrow.

Oh typical rA change the topic when its pointed out that the point he has made isn't correct?

So by your reckoning, if he doesn't play much this season, nobody can comment on him being a wasted signing because he hasn't had a chance to prove himself?

In point of fact I wasn't criticising him anyway, I was questioning why we signed a player who has so far done **** all, precisely because he hasn't been picked. I didn't say he was ****e or any critical description of him, just wondered why we signed him and then haven't used him? As a former teacher I'd have thought you would tell the difference between criticism and observation?

As for being "on his back" from the start, what does that mean? I questioned why we had signed why we had signed a 34 year old journeyman striker whose goalscoring record wasn't that impressive. I recall you reeling off the list of clubs he had played for and using that as a basis for defending signing him.

By the way, if you don't like having your posts responded to by me, I would suggests you don't bother to comment on them. I was merely raising a point for a discussion and funnily enough you were the only one the had a passive aggressive response and yet again missed the ****ing point!