+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 683

Thread: New manager

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    21,025
    Quote Originally Posted by nice1simmy View Post
    No, you said 'not proven' was effectively 'not guilty' so now you're contradicting yourself?
    As i said there's a BIG difference between the two verdicts
    There really isn't.
    They're both verdicts of acquittal.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    12,430
    Quote Originally Posted by InversneckieDob View Post
    There really isn't.
    They're both verdicts of acquittal.
    I would rather be found not guilty of something.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    21,025
    Quote Originally Posted by Aldo1983 View Post
    I would rather be found not guilty of something.
    I wouldn't care either way if I was acquitted.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    33,119
    Quote Originally Posted by InversneckieDob View Post
    I wouldn't care either way if I was acquitted.
    Think it matters now. The Amanda Duffy case changed that, didn’t it? He phoned the parents up after his verdict to rub it in. Pleasant fella

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    21,025
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    Think it matters now. The Amanda Duffy case changed that, didn’t it? He phoned the parents up after his verdict to rub it in. Pleasant fella
    That was to do with the double jeopardy rule.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    12,430
    Quote Originally Posted by InversneckieDob View Post
    I wouldn't care either way if I was acquitted.
    You wouldn't be saying that when you get sacked from the AbMad police for a not proven. Internal investigations would have their second bite at the cherry.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    21,025
    Quote Originally Posted by Aldo1983 View Post
    You wouldn't be saying that when you get sacked from the AbMad police for a not proven. Internal investigations would have their second bite at the cherry.
    I always get results........it's a bottom line business.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    33,119
    Quote Originally Posted by InversneckieDob View Post
    I always get results........it's a bottom line business.
    Your record in teuchter crime solving if second to none. Not blowing my own trumpet here but I solved the stolen dug in Edinburgh mystery.

    Mondo & standfreeFM talk a good game but I’m not seeing much in the way of results

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,783
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    It wasn’t insufficient evidence, it was that they didn’t think they could ‘win’ in Livingston single mum vs Scotland’s top QC

    There’s a difference there.
    Quote Originally Posted by InversneckieDob View Post
    There really isn't.
    They're both verdicts of acquittal.
    There really is,'not guilty' means it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt that you're innocent,'not proven' means they cant prove either way whether you're guilty or innocent,big difference for me but you're correct in that you walk away a free man with both verdicts

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    21,025
    Quote Originally Posted by nice1simmy View Post
    There really is,'not guilty' means it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt that you're innocent,'not proven' means they cant prove either way whether you're guilty or innocent,big difference for me but you're correct in that you walk away a free man with both verdicts
    In law there isn't.
    The onus of proof always lies with the Crown*.
    If they fail to prove their case the correct verdict is one of acquittal.


    *Exceptions can apply with some "special defences".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •