Quote Originally Posted by BCram View Post
I think that is the key. I think Deeranged has made a valid point but if there isn't some scientific support for it then it would appear that he is mistaken. There nothing wrong in thinking for yourself and questioning authority IMO. I would prefer if Deeranged was mistaken in his views but I would be more upset if he were proved correct and long term harm were to be caused by the genetic engineering approach to the creation of vaccinations.
I'm not mistaken, I'm presenting a thought an opinion that is based on independent thought and fact, the fact being how the Pfizer vaccine functions to cause immunity. The fact is that it introduces mRNA which changes the coding of human DNA. That is all I'm saying, it cannot be refuted because that's how the thing works.

As regards Grantzer claiming I haven't presented any evidence - well that's probably indicative of how society functions these days, don't think for yourself and if there isn't a website that says it in a banner headline then it can't be true.

If anyone needs website evidence then read the one I posted a link to where it says

'Many standard vaccines work by injecting a dead or weakened form of the pathogen into the body in preparations that are designed not to make you sick but rather to build immunity. The key to building this immunity is that the portion of the pathogen called the antigen trains the immune system to recognise and respond to the infectious agent.

RNA vaccines work by introducing into the body a messenger RNA (mRNA) sequence that contains the genetic instructions for the vaccinated person’s own cells to produce the vaccine antigens and generate an immune response.'

If that doesn't say 'messing with DNA' to anyone then fair enough, they're entitled to their opinion based on their independent thought on the matter but it says just that to me. Sending externally produced genetic instructions for the cell to modify DNA to produce antigens - also known as genetic modification.