Yet more lies perpetuating panic

[Deeranged]

Depends,did you read the study,check it was robust,read the peer reviews,and analyse the methodology,or did you read a quote on a website?

If you did the first,it was not a waste of a year,if you did the second,well....

No actually,I don't think it matters in your case,you took a phrase you recognised,and tried to be smart.

That makes you the whole of an ass

Doesn't mean I was being witty at all then? Just an ass? You're just the tail, I am the whole of the ass?

I'm putting you on ignore, Tainted says you can do it, because you just post ****e.

[grantzer]

Doesn't mean I was being witty at all then? Just an ass? You're just the tail, I am the whole of the ass?

I'm putting you on ignore, Tainted says you can do it, because you just post ****e.

Nope,a half wit maybe.

You put me on ignore if you want,I will keep pointing out when you are wrong. You won't see it,but I hear ignorance is bliss.


You must be the most blissful person alive

[Returnofrros]

"The decline of infections in England began before full lockdown....such a scenario....would be consistent with Sweden, which began it's decline in fatal infections shortly after the UK, but did so on the basis of measures well short of full lockdown"

Simon Wood university of Edinburgh.

[Returnofrros]

"The UK lockdown was both superfluous ( it did not prevent the otherwise explosive behaviour of the spread of covid) and ineffective ( it did not slow down the death growth rate visibly)

S.Homburg Leibntz uni hannover.

[Returnofrros]

"Given that the evidence reveals that the corona disease declines even without a full lockdown, it is recomendable to reverse the current policy and remove the lockdown"

Isaac Ben Times of Israel

[Deeranged]

Stop quoting academics who have no agenda. You're making an ass of yourself.

Unless of course you've spent three months critically analysing and comparing data from multiple trusted sources.

[Returnofrros]

Stop quoting academics who have no agenda. You're making an ass of yourself.

Unless of course you've spent three months critically analysing and comparing data from multiple trusted sources.

Ok for balance

" hi Kaye Edna here 1st time caller. Eh think they shud hae mair lockdoon Kaye, cause Ken like see when they shut the bingo at the meccÃ* em nae batthered going oot so if em in a body in. See me and Freda dinnae go oot when the pavements are slippy and eh read covid makes the pavements slippy Ken. And another thing thon wee lassie Nicola she wudnae bull**** wud she no wee classy shoes like that.....nah it's staying in for me Kaye, em oot
again when the bingo starts.....stay safe scotland"

Random gadgee Radio Covid

[Returnofrros]

"Stay at home orders, closure of all non-essential buisnesses and requiring the wearing of face masks or coverings in public was NOT associated with any independent additional impact"

Norwich medical school.

[Returnofrros]

"These strategies might not have saved many lives in western Europe.

We also show that neighbouring countries applying less restrictive social distancing measures.....experience very similar time evolution of the epidemic.

Since the full lockdown strategies are shown to have no impact on the epidemics slowdown, one should consider their potentially high inherit death toll as a net loss of human life"

Esenads centre for scientific research.

[grantzer]

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2766229 This paper compares bordering counties in Iowa and Illinois. The trends were similar before Illinois issued a stay-at-home order, but “after that, cases increased more quickly in Iowa and more slowly in Illinois.� The difference represents “30.4% of the 716 total cases in those Iowa counties by that date.�