A possible solution?

[kritichris]

Tactical coach, is that for the players or Mr. Dyche?

[Altobelli]

Tactical coach, is that for the players or Mr. Dyche?

You now and again seem to read my mind Chris.

[doggert]

Tactical coach, is that for the players or Mr. Dyche?

I guess both will benfit from that.

[army88]

Tactical coach, is that for the players or Mr. Dyche?

Posted this many times going right back to relegation and then to promotion again that Dyche would need to learn to change shape , alter personnel and have the ability to step back and see situation s developing in front of him ( I realise that this is me criticising a premiership manager ).

I've played at a good level and played for tactically aware managers who saw things and changed to counteract ( that's at counties level - not premiership ).

Dyche is still very rigid 442 and built defensive, but to his credit to now he's kept us in this league .

May be some of that is down to our limited squad and he feels see get murdered outside his rigidity.

I'm more for players who can play expressing themselves , even when that means cocking up or losing possession , against Brighton it looked to me like he just released the reigns two notches and we looked a different proposition.

The game before at Chelsea he left Peters exposed to Hudson Odio with no cover at all from Brady or McNeil , did he see it ? Did he think what we produced was acceptable ? Who knows.

What I do know is as above he keeps pulling out of the hat , it isn't pretty but he seems to keep us up.