+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 2981

Thread: O/T. The Government's handling of Covid

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    9,421
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_Faber View Post
    Far be it from me to offer a balanced view, but I will anyway.

    MA is right on all counts, the only one I'd take slight issue with would be PPE because HMG were genuinely living with a new beast at the time and few countries covered themselves in glory
    My comments on the PPE were aimed at the fact that they have now given PPE contracts to a number of firms owned by friends, family and donors to the party who had no PPE experience and have cocked up the whole PPE issue costing the UK in excess of £100M. The government cock up was not putting out tenders for the contracts, choosing, instead, to put money into the back pockets of F & & donrs rather than giving the contracts to companies with a track record in supplying PPE.

    Pandemic or not, the firms that got those contracts got them through varying degrees of nepotism. Totally unacceptable.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    9,035
    Quote Originally Posted by MadAmster View Post
    My comments on the PPE were aimed at the fact that they have now given PPE contracts to a number of firms owned by friends, family and donors to the party who had no PPE experience and have cocked up the whole PPE issue costing the UK in excess of £100M. The government cock up was not putting out tenders for the contracts, choosing, instead, to put money into the back pockets of F & & donrs rather than giving the contracts to companies with a track record in supplying PPE.

    Pandemic or not, the firms that got those contracts got them through varying degrees of nepotism. Totally unacceptable.
    Agreed but you covered that in another point - IMO if they’d gone to their mates and made as good a job as has been made of the vaccines I think most folk would have been less critical

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,423
    Quote Originally Posted by MadAmster View Post
    My comments on the PPE were aimed at the fact that they have now given PPE contracts to a number of firms owned by friends, family and donors to the party who had no PPE experience and have cocked up the whole PPE issue costing the UK in excess of £100M. The government cock up was not putting out tenders for the contracts, choosing, instead, to put money into the back pockets of F & & donrs rather than giving the contracts to companies with a track record in supplying PPE.

    Pandemic or not, the firms that got those contracts got them through varying degrees of nepotism. Totally unacceptable.

    That may have worked in a perfect world MA, but at the time everyone in the world was trying to buy PPE, it wasn't a case of putting it out for tender, like the EU have found out with the vaccines. Established PPE companies entire production schedules were quickly taken up, so then you fall back on your 'contacts'. Many companies with no previous PPE experience have turned their hand to quickly setting up production, whether you select one of these successful companies would have partially been down to luck. Naturally your 'contacts' will be friends, friends of friends, family, friends of family, suppliers of other items etc, etc. There was no time for a proper procurement procedure, corners were cut and unfortunately it wasn't the same level of success as the vaccination programme.

    How much was the PPE a failure in terms of actual supply, we had plenty of examples of individual medics complaining of shortages, but were these isolated incidents caused by isolated local supply issues? I know for a fact that my friend, a manager in a clerical NHS department with no physical connection to the covid operation, was appalled by the general behaviour of her staff, including helping themselves to PPE intended for the front line staff. I doubt that this was an isolated incidence, then you will have failures on a local level when distributing supplies. How many of these well publicised incidences of shortages occurred when the 'victim's' first phone call, was not to the next person in the supply chain, but to the media, for whatever reason? It's still happening now, people who have slipped through the vaccination net are preferring to contact the media, rather than a simple phone call to their GP.

    The one thing that points to the PPE supply not being the total failure that it appears, is that throughout the pandemic, official ONS figures have shown that NHS staff, including front line, are no more likely to die from covid than any other occupation. If we are to believe that staff were without PPE, then surely these death figures would have been much higher?

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •