Met police killer

[soulman101]

After what he did to Sarah Everard, he should be hanged by his neck.
Time we brought back capital punishment.

[Joy_Division]

I understand the reaction of wanting scum executed because even though I am against the death penalty I still get that anger and think that the offender deserves to die. But I would feel content if a murderer etc received a genuine life sentence with no prospect of parole and the conditions he or she were kept in were very basic. No TV's or games consoles or radio etc. Just a book once a week to read and an hours exercise a day and that would be for the rest of their lives. We have homeless people on the streets who have nothing, yet we have criminals living in warm conditions with regular food and entertainment and opportunities of learning skills etc. Its all ar*e about face in my opinion.

[boingy]

Sad case. Aside to this a Baroness from the house of lords said that ALL men should have a 6pm curfew.

[Leicesterbaggie]

I am against capital punishment because mistakes have been made in the past and individuals have gone to their deaths being innocent. If new evidence comes to light to prove a person's innocence, again as has happened, if they are in prison they can be released and financially compensated. There are also degrees of murder to take into consideration. However, for a crime like this, life should mean life, and he should spend the rest of his days behind bars with only the basic comforts. This of course is if he is found guilty, which looks highly likely.

[mickd1961]

There's something really wrong whereby a serving officer can be caught exposing himself in public and not immediately suspended from duty.

He should’ve been investigated immediately by an outside force or internal affairs and also been under surveillance because he was an obvious time bomb.

This is a problem with these supposedly “lesser” type s e x crimes.

I had a guy doing my garden for me for the last couple of years and he thought he was a real ladies man, I’m always at home so he knew not to overstep the mark at my place.

I took him on at work on a casual basis at work last summer and he kept pestering a female Royal Mail driver and one afternoon he pushed his luck too far and I got to hear about it..........he was fired the next day and I personally apologised to the driver for the behaviour.

Role forward six months.

A relative of ours works at a local launderette and this guy was doing his washing there and was constantly trying it on with her, we didn’t know until later on because it’s a more distant family member.

Anyway, she constantly rebuffed him as she’s married and she made it clear she had no interest in him.

A few weeks ago she came out of the back door of the launderette and he was lurking in the shadows and pounced on her assaulting her s e x u a l l y.

This was caught on CCTV as plain as day.

He’s been released whilst investigations are “ongoing” despite this clear evidence of him concealing himself and waiting for her to come out in a vulnerable area.

To my mind this is completely wrong, this bloke is a clear danger to women and a 52 year old leopard doesn’t change its spots.

Where there’s clear photographic proof of this type of assault of indecent exposure men should be put on remand pending investigation.

[Leicesterbaggie]

Sad case. Aside to this a Baroness from the house of lords said that ALL men should have a 6pm curfew.

As a man, if this comment was made, don't you feel deeply insulted. If she did make this comment then it's not all men that should be made to observe a 6 pm curfew but her, not after 6 pm but for 24 hours in some mental institution. I have always been respectful to women, something that many women now object to as being patronising, although I have to say a very small minority. My wife, who is one of the most demure and ladylike of women, also thinks that her comment is unacceptable. Of course there are men whose behaviour needs to alter but please don't tar the majority of decent men with the same brush.

[baggieal]

There's something really wrong whereby a serving officer can be caught exposing himself in public and not immediately suspended from duty.

He should’ve been investigated immediately by an outside force or internal affairs and also been under surveillance because he was an obvious time bomb.

This is a problem with these supposedly “lesser” type s e x crimes.

I had a guy doing my garden for me for the last couple of years and he thought he was a real ladies man, I’m always at home so he knew not to overstep the mark at my place.

I took him on at work on a casual basis at work last summer and he kept pestering a female Royal Mail driver and one afternoon he pushed his luck too far and I got to hear about it..........he was fired the next day and I personally apologised to the driver for the behaviour.

Role forward six months.

A relative of ours works at a local launderette and this guy was doing his washing there and was constantly trying it on with her, we didn’t know until later on because it’s a more distant family member.

Anyway, she constantly rebuffed him as she’s married and she made it clear she had no interest in him.

A few weeks ago she came out of the back door of the launderette and he was lurking in the shadows and pounced on her assaulting her s e x u a l l y.

This was caught on CCTV as plain as day.

He’s been released whilst investigations are “ongoing” despite this clear evidence of him concealing himself and waiting for her to come out in a vulnerable area.

To my mind this is completely wrong, this bloke is a clear danger to women and a 52 year old leopard doesn’t change its spots.

Where there’s clear photographic proof of this type of assault of indecent exposure men should be put on remand pending investigation.

Those who knew he exposed himself should be sacked as should he have been immediately. Not second chance in this role.

If found guilty he should be put before a firing squad and then his remains dumped at sea!

[boingy]

As a man, if this comment was made, don't you feel deeply insulted. If she did make this comment then it's not all men that should be made to observe a 6 pm curfew but her, not after 6 pm but for 24 hours in some mental institution. I have always been respectful to women, something that many women now object to as being patronising, although I have to say a very small minority. My wife, who is one of the most demure and ladylike of women, also thinks that her comment is unacceptable. Of course there are men whose behaviour needs to alter but please don't tar the majority of decent men with the same brush.

I think the remark was ludicrous. Should be sacked. It is an insult. Think of all the blokes picking up their wives late at night having to stop at home whilst their wives/daughters are now having to make their own way home unsafely. Nutjob!

[WBA1955]

I understand the reaction of wanting scum executed because even though I am against the death penalty I still get that anger and think that the offender deserves to die. But I would feel content if a murderer etc received a genuine life sentence with no prospect of parole and the conditions he or she were kept in were very basic. No TV's or games consoles or radio etc. Just a book once a week to read and an hours exercise a day and that would be for the rest of their lives. We have homeless people on the streets who have nothing, yet we have criminals living in warm conditions with regular food and entertainment and opportunities of learning skills etc. Its all ar*e about face in my opinion.

Ditto.
Capital punishment never deterred Haig, Christie, Smith, Jack the Ripper etc. and too many people have hung even though they never committed the crime, Edith Thompson and Derek Bentley.

[WBA1955]

I think the remark was ludicrous. Should be sacked. It is an insult. Think of all the blokes picking up their wives late at night having to stop at home whilst their wives/daughters are now having to make their own way home unsafely. Nutjob!

I would feel safer if all women were kept off the roads between 6am and 10pm, most of them have difficulty manoeuvring a supermarket trolley, let alone a big 4x4.