Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
Quite surprised at that but happy to stand corrected, MA. Either way...Lawrence and Bennett appear to have been punished in three or four different ways. RK not at all.
Seems like a perfect example of legality and morality in conflict to me.
"The League Appeals Committee has heard and dismissed an appeal under the Regulations of the EFL by Derby County (“the Club”) against the decision of the Player Related Dispute Commission (“the PRDC”) in the case of Richard Keogh," said the EFL in a statement.

"The case arose out of events on 24 September 2019 in which Mr Keogh was seriously injured in a road traffic accident and his subsequent dismissal by the Club.

"The PRDC held that Mr Keogh had not committed gross misconduct, that he had not brought the Club into serious disrepute, and that he had been wrongfully dismissed by the Club."

Derby County declined to comment on the matter.


Sacked for gross misconduct, but the other two were not?
The other two were convicted in a court of law?
Keogh was not.

Yet only one was sacked for gross misconduct.

I fail to understand which piece of this confuses you RA?

Yes morally he should have been sacked. but so should the other two, based purely on offence seriousness.

The fact his injury turned out to not to be season ending, also calls Derbys eagerness to get rid into question.