Transfer Rumour Thread 21/22

[AraBrian]

Whatever we think about this. It’s can’t just be seen as another cheap option. I’m assuming we forked out cash for Caig and will have to pay off NA remaining contract. If this is the case then they must see something in this lad? Also TA made comments just after TC appointment about the references to a cheap option and said that it wasn’t the case going by the contract he has just been giving. That’s said it doesn’t mean it will work just that they obviously believe what they are doing is the best way forward for the club. Time will tell.

Not sure they will have to pay out NA's contract what I have read on here is NA fell out with the manager and jacked it in?Have seen it happen every where I have worked have even done it myself and not heard of anyone getting paid for leaving?

[TerryTheTerror]

Depends on the content of his contract. In normal life your are right but football can be very different.

[AraBrian]

Depends on the content of his contract. In normal life your are right but football can be very different.

Yeah TTT football maybe different but if is true that NA fell out with the manager and jacked his job in it is him cancelling the contract and not the club so is him if anyone who should pay compensation?

[GUNBOAT]

Yeah TTT football maybe different but if is true that NA fell out with the manager and jacked his job in it is him cancelling the contract and not the club so is him if anyone who should pay compensation?

Tam keeps saying what he has been told to say which is,"He remains an employee of the club."Now we all know he will never work at Tannadice under the current regime so negotiations must be ongoing to settle his contract.

[AraBrian]

Tam keeps saying what he has been told to say which is,"He remains an employee of the club."Now we all know he will never work at Tannadice under the current regime so negotiations must be ongoing to settle his contract.

So he has not left?I thought he had handed in his gear and left then slagged of the manager and TA.Are utd just trying to pay him off then so manager can bring in his own team?If so can't see what the problem is a lot of managers want their own team of coachs around them?If is true he was slagging of TA and TC they could probably just sack him without paying him any compensation?

[GUNBOAT]

So he has not left?I thought he had handed in his gear and left then slagged of the manager and TA.Are utd just trying to pay him off then so manager can bring in his own team?If so can't see what the problem is a lot of managers want their own team of coachs around them?If is true he was slagging of TA and TC they could probably just sack him without paying him any compensation?

There was apparently gross negligence at the club that Alexander spoke to Tam about. The Head Coach in two interviews on the radio over the weekend said and i quote,"Neil Alexander remains an employee of the club."
Shedboy 71 has said that Alexander went to the press with his concern's but that is a load O shyte or we would not be having this conversation as we would be reading the story.You do not break confidentiality rules when a pay off is coming your way.
As i keep having to remind posters its not my fault our club is a basket case.

[AraBrian]

There was apparently gross negligence at the club that Alexander spoke to Tam about. The Head Coach in two interviews on the radio over the weekend said and i quote,"Neil Alexander remains an employee of the club."
Shedboy 71 has said that Alexander went to the press with his concern's but that is a load O shyte or we would not be having this conversation as we would be reading the story.You do not break confidentiality rules when a pay off is coming your way.
As i keep having to remind posters its not my fault our club is a basket case.

Ok so NA has decided he knows how to run the club better than the people who have got us promotion and kept us in top league.He is claiming there is gross negligence at the club and he wants to either leave or run the club his way.If he is allowed to run the club his way he will still want the people who run it now to pay for his way of doing things?If they decide they want to run it their way which he claims is grossly neglegent he wants to leave but wants to be given a big healthy check to do so.I agree if the owner and board decide to let a goalie coach run our club his way because he is not happy with their way then our club is a basket case.If NA is not happy in his job and believes club is a basket case then why does he not just resign?He can then go to the press and tell them how MO would not let the goalie coach run the club and what a basket case of a club it is.