Lee Hughes

[cher1]

Possibly, but we signed him with a full knowledge of his past and he was a good servant to the club. Soooooo, in a way, it's a bit of a shame.

But we had different owners then. I can't see our current owners agreeing to it somehow.

[countygump]

But we had different owners then. I can't see our current owners agreeing to it somehow.

Different owners, different manager, different players. One thing hasn't changed though, we're still the same club. The same club that Lee Hughes played for and scored a shedload of goals for and for some of that time as our player, he spent (voluntarily) taking a lesser wage as the club was brassic. As I said, it would be a shame not to grant him such a small favour but I would understand if our present owners declined.