Clark did well yesterday first half, won a surprising amount of headers, but when game got stretched, as happens second half, and we started to launch it, it started to feel like we were playing with 10 men. That is no reflection on Clark, just like Shankland he doesn't have the physical attributes to play that game i.e. pace to run in behind to take pressure off or physical strength to bully centre halves, though he made a good attempt at it first half, but that's when he had bodies around him. Maybe a fit Apperre might have been useful sub last 25 mins. That is why I'm not fussed about McNulty, i think he is slightly better than what we have, but he is also similar.

Think we need a physical presence. You look at successful Utd sides - Dodds in the 80s, 94 Brewster, 3rd under Tommy McLean - Oloffson, Levein/Houston - Daly, McNamara's purple patch - Ciftci. None of those sides was considered a long ball team, all played good football, but its giving the opposition a different problem, gives us a different attacking option, and can help relieve pressure.

I still think even playing the way we did yesterday with the players we have, we are going to be low scorers again in the league. Hopefully the Finnish winger is the first step to rectifying that. If we could play that high intensity football with whippets/movement/penetration up front I'd actually look forward to watching us again.