1) That season was our only chance of an immediate return. The stats and facts strongly suggest that it is a misnomer that the first season is best chance a relegated club has of getting back up and that includes the much talked parachute payments.

2) 4 year contract shows confidence and suggests stability but unless you know the T&C's regarding termination and compensation it could be a 12 year contract and in all likelihood wouldn't matter financially. This has been well covered, you just need to look past the headline.

3) I presume a wide ranging database on players. The acquisition of Notts have signed dross has been said of every past owner I can think of all the way back to Pavis.The fact we signed dross prior to our current owners is one of the reasons we are now NL. That can't be on the Reedtz brothers.

4) Valid concern, I don't see this as a positive that some suggest. I would prefer them to only be involved with Notts but with their business makes sense to be more than one club especially in different countries. We don't know how much money they have or more accurately willing to invest in football clubs.

5) This is just guesswork on top of guesswork. I'm sure nobody on here knows the cost, level of debt inherited after the sh!tshow circus finally ended. How do you know they wanted to make a quick buck? Obviously their plan is to buy and sell players for a profit (a new concept for Notts) and they can do that far more effectively back in L2. You could be right, you maybe wrong but we don't know. It's a guess.