O/T another child murdered.

[Ericsladkilnhurst]

I said little Arthur's case was a reason to bring back the death penalty, another child joins
the list of being a victim, when will the government act, a child can not defend themselves.
May these murderers be punished in prison, by fellow inmates, with pain to what they
put a young child through.

[jocksgloves]

25 years, out in 15. 8 years, out in 4. Welcome to Britain, the child abuser's paradise.

[KerrAvon]

25 years, out in 15. 8 years, out in 4. Welcome to Britain, the child abuser's paradise.

Life with a 25 year tariff means that she cannot be considered for release until she has served 25 years. She then has to go before the Parole Board who assess whether she is safe to be released. First applications are often unsuccessful. After release, she will remain on licence and at risk of recall if she fails to comply with its terms or reoffends.

[KerrAvon]

😢❤️❤️ You poor little mite. So beautiful, young, innocent and knew of nothing else but terror and pain.

May you be at peace and playing in Gods little Childrens garden. Fly with the angels sweetheart no one can hurt you anymore now xx

I’m grinding my teeth in anger and holding back the tears as I type this message. This is where the English law is an antiquated dinosaur where there is no deterrent to plain vindictive calculated murder. Put it to a peoples vote to see if any chosen method of execution should be brought back for 100% proven cases such as these and see what happens. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!

So if it's death for 100% proven case, what level of proof is required to be eligible for life imprisonment - 95%?

How would it work? Woud the jury be asked to indicate what percentage sure they are?

As I pointed out last week, there is no evidence to suggest that the death penalty acts as a deterrent. Murderers don't generally plan to get caught. And the murder rate in the US admirably suggests that not many people are being deterred.

[Stovicmiller]

I’ve never thought hanging acts as a deterrent. But if they are dead they Carnt commit any more crimes when released.

[Brin]

So if it's death for 100% proven case, what level of proof is required to be eligible for life imprisonment - 95%?

How would it work? Woud the jury be asked to indicate what percentage sure they are?

As I pointed out last week, there is no evidence to suggest that the death penalty acts as a deterrent. Murderers don't generally plan to get caught. And the murder rate in the US admirably suggests that not many people are being deterred.

Before I reply, I have noticed all you seem to do on replying to a post is get straight into the issue. Not a dot of sympathy shown in your replies for Star Hobson at all, why is that?

As for for Savannah Brockhill, she's got to serve at least 25 years, for me because there is no death penalty, she should serve a whole life tariff and never be released. How can anyone sit on a parole board and allow this pure evil twisted scum to apply for release even on licence?

According to court reporting, this hideous monster laughed as proceedings got underway, smiled and made a heart shaped gesture to her family when she entered court. Just shows how twisted her mind must be without an ounce of respectability shown to little Star Hobson' family.

She took a life, she should forfeit her own!

As for there being no deterrent for bringing back the death penalty as you continually remind us all, of course there is. The one's who committed murder in the States and were put to death can't do it anymore. That's a deterrent in itself.

[Scum-Triumphant]

Another 2 in Blackburn in todays news.

[sota]

As for there being no deterrent for bringing back the death penalty as you continually remind us all, of course there is. The one's who committed murder in the States and were put to death can't do it anymore. That's a deterrent in itself.

Quite right mate, and even if it's not a deterrent, at least it's justice, or just desserts if any nitpickers are on duty.