Quote Originally Posted by animallittle3 View Post
Bloody Pat Cryne lied to thi in 2006 with his box office signings unless tha counts Grant McCann !!!

He lied to thi when he told a forum they didn't know how good John Stones was when he was initially sold for £1.9m to Everton .

Chien Lee told thi we'd be stronger this season and tha believed that n all .

Even the Tommy Taylor money in the 50's was probably pocketed by Joe Richards , a world record fee because it certainly wasn't spent on the ground or team back then and it was impossible to have debts of £30k in the 50's with players on ten quid a week .

Point is there's no integrity in football and there certainly won't be any integrity when a young American kid starts scoring goals for fun and his club suddenly realise he's worth 15 times more than they realised .

What planet are you on ?

Market forces blow away verbal agreements or any other agreement .

He was their player , possession is nine tenths of the law .
I'm on planet earth Animal. I stick with my points already made; there were good reasons we might have had a deal for Dike.

I have no problem with the owners taking 750k out of the club either to pay for it. It's just an accounting issue. However, there are many other reasons for my originally 'undecided' position to change to against the owners, some of which Piggy has highlighted. However, the Dike saga has more to it than we have so far been told. End of the day, it's over because we didn't get him, but I suspect other information will present itself eventually.