Freedom of information Covid

[bordering]

It's called cognitive dissonance.

People have to justify themselves irrelevant of facts.

So if you got jabbed you have to prove it was the right thing to do and you have to reject all counter arguments usually not with facts but with ad hominem criticisms.

So the arguments are futile but eventually the realities will out- & they are all bad

[baggiematt]

It's called cognitive dissonance.

People have to justify themselves irrelevant of facts.

So if you got jabbed you have to prove it was the right thing to do and you have to reject all counter arguments usually not with facts but with ad hominem criticisms.

So the arguments are futile but eventually the realities will out- & they are all bad

No Bordering. It’s called confirmation bias, when you have such a strong view on something you only find facts to support it not the full picture. It’s funny isn’t it, you often find those who don’t believe in the vaccine, also don’t buy into restrictions, masks etc..

Did you know Dr Campbell also supports mask wearing and other measures? But that doesn’t support your narrative. So is this guy credible or not?

My issue with YouTube docs is that it’s one way. No one can challenge, he can’t go into detail and it isn’t peer reviewed. You can basically say what you want and strap the word Doctor to it and make it a ‘fact’. Watch the video; what he says, what he doesn’t say and then read the comments to see how folk have interpreted it. How you present facts is important for how it’s interpreted.