+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 4887

Thread: O/T:- ⚠️Impressed with the leadership [The UK Party Politics Thread]

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    8,014
    Do those posters who oppose the requirement for NHS staff to be vaccinated against covid also oppose the requirement to be vaccinated against Hepatitis B if undertaking exposure-prone procedures?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    18,918
    Quote Originally Posted by cher1 View Post
    Do those posters who oppose the requirement for NHS staff to be vaccinated against covid also oppose the requirement to be vaccinated against Hepatitis B if undertaking exposure-prone procedures?
    If they were being forced to take an experimental vaccine that was harming and killing more people than all other vaccines put together that didn't protect either them or their patients from Hepatitis B, then yes, obviously.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    724
    Quote Originally Posted by cher1 View Post
    Do those posters who oppose the requirement for NHS staff to be vaccinated against covid also oppose the requirement to be vaccinated against Hepatitis B if undertaking exposure-prone procedures?
    No. A different set of circumstances.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    733
    Quote Originally Posted by cher1 View Post
    Do those posters who oppose the requirement for NHS staff to be vaccinated against covid also oppose the requirement to be vaccinated against Hepatitis B if undertaking exposure-prone procedures?
    I think the major differences here Cher are that one is an actual vaccine, i.e if you have the vaccine then you cannot catch or spread this certain disease. Plus regular vaccines have longitudinal studies of 10 years + to evaluate long term side effects and safety.

    Obviously we have just been through quite a unique situation, requiring unique responses. But there are very valid reasons for people not wanting to be jabbed

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    8,014
    Quote Originally Posted by SaltySeaDog View Post
    I think the major differences here Cher are that one is an actual vaccine, i.e if you have the vaccine then you cannot catch or spread this certain disease. Plus regular vaccines have longitudinal studies of 10 years + to evaluate long term side effects and safety.

    Obviously we have just been through quite a unique situation, requiring unique responses. But there are very valid reasons for people not wanting to be jabbed
    Surely they are both vaccines? The covid one is dealing with a rapidly mutating virus, so may need modifying from time to time in the same way the flu vaccine is, and may not offer complete protection. But it does offer significant protection.

    The Hep B vaccine doesn't offer complete protection, particularly as people get older.

    I take your point about length of studies, although that was mitigated against by the number of concurrent studies that went in across the world, which is unusual in vaccine testing.

    Let's hope that the virus continues to weaken and that this all becomes a moot point eh.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    733
    Quote Originally Posted by cher1 View Post
    Surely they are both vaccines? The covid one is dealing with a rapidly mutating virus, so may need modifying from time to time in the same way the flu vaccine is, and may not offer complete protection. But it does offer significant protection.

    The Hep B vaccine doesn't offer complete protection, particularly as people get older.

    I take your point about length of studies, although that was mitigated against by the number of concurrent studies that went in across the world, which is unusual in vaccine testing.

    Let's hope that the virus continues to weaken and that this all becomes a moot point eh.



    It could indeed be called a vaccine now, as the definition of what a vaccine is was officially changed last year. And yes the data and number of studies for this particular intervention is unprecedented, but cannot mitigate for a longitudinal study, as only time can give that reassurance.

    But drastic measures were needed, so I get why something had to be done quickly.

    I totally agree though. I really hope we can all move on from this soon enough.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •