Quote Originally Posted by westcountryvillain View Post
It was me that termed him a defender of jihadists, having looked further into it I was mistaken, my humblest apologies. He did however say that terrorist incidents are part and parcel of living in a big city, which as someone with a legal background can hardly brush off as clumsy or ill considered.

When confronted with worsening violent crime figures he stated that he believed London is safer, was that not a perfect moment to highlight the impact of budget cuts?
What RW rags claimed he said;
"Terror attack are part and parcel of living in a big city"

What he actually said;
“Part and parcel of living in a great global city is you’ve got to be prepared for these things, you’ve got to be vigilant, you’ve got to support the police doing an incredibly hard job, you got to support the security services.”

Its quite easy to throw misleading statements like this one, to make the reader believe something else and provoke an emotional reaction.

Another example of why reading and believing anything in the Daily Mail or The Sun is not only not credible, but completely worthless. Their agenda is to influence the masses against any person or group that is problematic to them.

This has absolutely happened with the EU; And now its happening with the BBC. Its a shame we have such a gullible electorate in this country.