Quote Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
The layman perspective is thus very "lay". Administrators do not sort out alleged financial malpractice - but if they uncover it there is a whistleblower responsibility. Their primary purpose is to stabilise the situation and work out a way forward that is better for stakeholders than liquidation. Fans are a stakeholder, albeit not financially significantly so - only for advance season ticket sales generally. The soft community aspects are nice to satisfy, but not a primary objective of the administration role.
I think we’re getting into semantics again.
When I said ‘financial malpractice’ I was referring to things that are already common knowledge, eg. the amount owed in overdue tax, the amounts owed to various service providers, the amount owed regarding certain transfers, the amount of ‘wrongdoing’ as regards FFP etc.
There is no element of ‘whistleblowing’ required in any of those matters because it is already known that those things have happened.

If the administrators aren’t going to ‘sort out’ such issues, and they’ve now had seven months, and they aren’t going to secure the club’s future and protect us from the increasingly likely, according to you, prospect of liquidation...then what have they been doing all this time?