+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 109

Thread: The Wokeness Thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,919
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_Faber View Post
    The term woke, as defined elsewhere here and on more trusted places on the internet, original meant roughly as you suggest, and nowt wrong with people who are 'woke' in that manner. Just nice, kind, thoughtful folk youmight say

    However, the term was initially hijacked by those who combined their view on social justice with an uncompromising, often unpleasant and mob mentalty response to anyone with a different view. As a response to that, the term was gradually takenover by those who DID have a different view, be it considered, extreme or nuanced and has developed from a complimentary to derogatory term. The majority of 'woke' ideology comes from what you would call 'the left'. The equivalent from the right is just referred to I guess as 'extremist'

    The phrase 'overwoking' was invented by me just for Swales' benefit - despite his protestations to the contrary his wokeness let him down when he assumed, and made an issue of, a comment about crossdressing. His repeated and lengthy attempts to clarify show his sensitivity to being rumbled but in other settings (ie facebook/twitter) there could have been a cast of thousands of 'the Woke' baying for blood of the O/P of the comment.
    Well in truth, woke was hijacked by the right and those who rather like yourself moan about "political correctness" going too far and other such phrases, or indeed you as a white aging male moaning (as you frequently have done) about the supposed "over representation of persons of an ethnic background in the media - justified by you saying "Its not the world I know". Which from the inability to recognise that there is another world out there, is clearly true, but also demonstrates your very narrow and somewhat bigoted perspective. Still you do apparently have broadly non racist friends, so thats fine then.

    Its been used as pejorative term by far right commentators and continued as such, it wasn't the left that did this, just the right who erroneously put a lot of dissimilar issues under one banner for the purposes of slagging off people who have a social conscience. I mean obviously the only people who go along with such rubbish are half wits.

    There is no such thing as "woke" ideology! Are you not bright enough to have worked that out? I mean I thought you claimed to be a reasonably sentient person who doesn't swallow (aka Thicky) the bull**** pushed out by right wing commentators, but obviously that isn't the case.

    Your English is rather poor for a native, though I do find that's the case with those of the gammon persuasion, usually when they are slagging off immigrants who speak it better than themselves. Not that you'd do that, no your more subtle, always keeping your prejudice just at an acceptable level - I actually have more respect for Thicky who is at last an open xenophobic, racist, bigot!

    So there are no such words as overwoking, wokeness, but like a lot of what you present as "facts" they were made up by you. How credible do you think you are when you post such tosh? By the way nice to think of my benefit, but as most of what you post just makes me laugh, perhaps best not to eh son?

    I didn't assume anything, I interpreted, as you did, correctly what GP had posted. In the spirit of being helpful I pointed out that what he had posted wasn't strictly true and also that maybe the player wouldn't give ****!

    You then accused me of being over woke!! I mean if being woke is about pointing out where the facts don't quite fit with what has just been said then fair enough guilty as charged m'lord!

    Then GP denied that his post meant that - I then asked for clarification as it seemed a perfectly good interpretation to me. GP hasn't responded, presumably because actually his post did mean that, but he was miffed that his little bit of banter had been corrected.

    At no point, then or now was I being over sensitive, I just thought it funny to point out that GP's post wasn't necessarily correct. Who would ahve guessed that the two immature people sniggering about a joke on cross dressing would get tetchy about being advised it wasn't strictly correct?

    **** knows why you got involved again, but I guess you had to try and use words you clearly don't understand, but had heard from somewhere in an attempt to look clever.

    So that went well then!
    Last edited by swaledale; 12-07-2022 at 09:47 PM.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •