+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: O/T What exactly is a life sentence?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Maybe its too complicated the a life sentence means life? I.E. if you get life you leave prison in a coffin?? Or is that too simple.

    Maybe dont have life sentences, have 25, 35, 45, or 55 year sentences with parole only becoming applicable once you've done your time?

    Thst seems sensible to me.

    The death penalty, not for me, its too barbaric in my opiniin. Just my opinion mind, I respect others!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,773
    Quote Originally Posted by rileyev.the.third View Post
    Maybe its too complicated the a life sentence means life? I.E. if you get life you leave prison in a coffin?? Or is that too simple.

    Maybe dont have life sentences, have 25, 35, 45, or 55 year sentences with parole only becoming applicable once you've done your time?

    Thst seems sensible to me.

    The death penalty, not for me, its too barbaric in my opiniin. Just my opinion mind, I respect others!!
    Riley, how does a Judge pull 34 years out of nowhere, what does 34 represent?

    Totally agree, 25, 35, 45, 55, must like their 5's apart from today

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    6,900
    Sharia law is the way to go. For example,

    1st offence - eg holding an illegal party during lockdown - hand off

    2nd offence - eg fathering more than one child outside wedlock - ***** off

    3rd offence - eg lying to parliament - head off.

    I think public beheadings at NYS would be quite popular.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,655
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    Riley, how does a Judge pull 34 years out of nowhere, what does 34 represent?

    Totally agree, 25, 35, 45, 55, must like their 5's apart from today
    Thw judge has to follow sentencing guidelines that requires him or her to assess a range of factors. He also has to take any mitigation into account.

    I believe the sentencing in this case was filmed for TV as part of a pilot scheme? If so, you will be able to see exactly how the 34 years was arrived at. It may make for quite dry viewing however

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,773
    Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
    Thw judge has to follow sentencing guidelines that requires him or her to assess a range of factors. He also has to take any mitigation into account.

    I believe the sentencing in this case was filmed for TV as part of a pilot scheme? If so, you will be able to see exactly how the 34 years was arrived at. It may make for quite dry viewing however
    Yes I'm well aware it was on TV but will not waste any of my time trying to view it. Obviously the question of 34 years being given has even bypassed yourself. What a weird number? Why not round it up or down? I'm also aware he has taken off the time on remand 457 days?

    Boo Hoo, what a horrific murder how she kept the decapitated body for two weeks before disposing of it, truly a twisted mind that needs Psychiatric help not prison.
    Last edited by Brin; 28-10-2022 at 09:47 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,655
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    Yes I'm well aware it was on TV but will not waste any of my time trying to view it. Obviously the question of 34 years being given has even bypassed yourself. What a weird number? Why not round it up or down? I'm also aware he has taken off the time on remand 457 days?

    Boo Hoo, what a horrific murder how she kept the decapitated body for two weeks before disposing of it, truly a twisted mind that needs Psychiatric help not prison.
    I was answering your question. I'm not sure what I said to cause you to have a tantrum.

    The notion of rounding up and down doesn't really fit with the concept of precision in sentencing. If 34 years is what the judge considered appropriate then 34 years is the sentence he should give.

    Do you have a fetish for multiples of the number 5? It's a funny old world

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,773
    Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
    I was answering your question. I'm not sure what I said to cause you to have a tantrum.

    The notion of rounding up and down doesn't really fit with the concept of precision in sentencing. If 34 years is what the judge considered appropriate then 34 years is the sentence he should give.

    Do you have a fetish for multiples of the number 5? It's a funny old world
    Tantrum? You having a bad night? I’m not having anything of the sort 😄

    I think I’ve asked a question you can’t answer and you’ve reacted cornered by it. My my…. Kerr throws a tantrum 😄

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,655
    Quote Originally Posted by rileyev.the.third View Post
    Maybe its too complicated the a life sentence means life? I.E. if you get life you leave prison in a coffin?? Or is that too simple.

    Maybe dont have life sentences, have 25, 35, 45, or 55 year sentences with parole only becoming applicable once you've done your time?

    Thst seems sensible to me.

    The death penalty, not for me, its too barbaric in my opiniin. Just my opinion mind, I respect others!!
    The type of sentence that you are suggesting was introduced in 2005 as the Indeterminate Imprisonment for Public Protection. They were abolished in 2012 after the government of the day noticed that the prisons were getting overcrowded.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •