Covid vaccinations - the legacy?

[Supersub6]

Did you have the vaccine mein freund?

Yes, because without it I would not have been allowed to continue my voluntary work and give help to those Veterans and their families who needed it.
I have never, ever had a flu vaccine and I don't need one in order to continue my work, however, when it came to the Covid I did not have a choice.
The way that I look at it is that I have been dying for almost 76 years and it is an evens bet that you could catch Covid and may die or maybe not or you could have the vaccine and you may die or maybe not. Bottom line is, whatever happens ---deal with it and continue helping others who really need help.
I waken up every morning and I am happy and worry free, the day that I don't waken up ------it's not my problem.
Take care and don't let the buggers grind you down mein freund.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Yes, because without it I would not have been allowed to continue my voluntary work and give help to those Veterans and their families who needed it.
I have never, ever had a flu vaccine and I don't need one in order to continue my work, however, when it came to the Covid I did not have a choice.
The way that I look at it is that I have been dying for almost 76 years and it is an evens bet that you could catch Covid and may die or maybe not or you could have the vaccine and you may die or maybe not. Bottom line is, whatever happens ---deal with it and continue helping others who really need help.
I waken up every morning and I am happy and worry free, the day that I don't waken up ------it's not my problem.
Take care and don't let the buggers grind you down mein freund.

What worries me about your post Supersub6 is a thoroughly decent human being going about his lawful business was coerced and made to have a vaccine which shall we say is questionable in its veracity.

Our neighbours were reluctantly forced to have the vaccine because they had family business to attend to in Germany - no jabs = no flights. They still fume about it.

[Supersub6]

What worries me about your post Supersub6 is a thoroughly decent human being going about his lawful business was coerced and made to have a vaccine which shall we say is questionable in its veracity.

Our neighbours were reluctantly forced to have the vaccine because they had family business to attend to in Germany - no jabs = no flights. They still fume about it.

BT, I know what you are saying and there has certainly been an exercise in control and coercion, however, it was my choice to have the vaccine and I have given my reasons for having it. As far as I am concerned it is now history and I do not worry about it or any effect it may or may not have on me.
As you are aware, I do not waste time or energy worrying about what may or may not happen because it is way outside of my control. Best bit of advice my mother gave me as a young lad trying to make his way in life "Don't worry about things which you can't affect. You will come to realise that there is about 97% of things which happen during your life that you can't influence"
It has always worked for me, however, I realise that I am the lucky one because I can just adopt the 'get on with life' attitude.

You chose not to have the vaccine and that is your prerogative and I have never criticised anyone for making up their own mind ---unlike all the scientists, MPs etc., etc. who have definitely been trying to turn the screw over everyone ---there is much more to come ----just don't worry about it!

[sinkov]

The legacy of untried, rushed to the mark vaccines perhaps...

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/med...67cee0635df661

Sarah Knapton again mon ami, "Science Editor" at the Daily Telegraph for what it's worth. Yet another piece where she talks about the excess deaths without ever mentioning the fact that vaccines could be playing a part, nor mentions vaccines at all. She knows all about the correlation between booster roll outs and excess deaths, you should read the comments under her pieces in the Telegraph pointing this out to her, but she steadfastly refuses any mention of the word vaccine. Why not ? One can only fall back on the best indicator of all and.........follow the money.

It's interesting that she also has form in this regard. About 6/7 years ago she was involved in some controversy when she wrote a piece that claimed vaping was just as injurious to your health as smoking cigarettes was. Even when this claim was proved spurious, she wasn't for backing down, the Tobacco lobby must have been delighted with her support, although it remains unclear to me why she would be on their side. Any ideas ?

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Sarah Knapton again mon ami, "Science Editor" at the Daily Telegraph for what it's worth. Yet another piece where she talks about the excess deaths without ever mentioning the fact that vaccines could be playing a part, nor mentions vaccines at all. She knows all about the correlation between booster roll outs and excess deaths, you should read the comments under her pieces in the Telegraph pointing this out to her, but she steadfastly refuses any mention of the word vaccine. Why not ? One can only fall back on the best indicator of all and.........follow the money.

It's interesting that she also has form in this regard. About 6/7 years ago she was involved in some controversy when she wrote a piece that claimed vaping was just as injurious to your health as smoking cigarettes was. Even when this claim was proved spurious, she wasn't for backing down, the Tobacco lobby must have been delighted with her support, although it remains unclear to me why she would be on their side. Any ideas ?

No idea mon ami, but the smokescreen is evaporating before our very eyes.

[Supersub6]

Sarah Knapton again mon ami, "Science Editor" at the Daily Telegraph for what it's worth. Yet another piece where she talks about the excess deaths without ever mentioning the fact that vaccines could be playing a part, nor mentions vaccines at all. She knows all about the correlation between booster roll outs and excess deaths, you should read the comments under her pieces in the Telegraph pointing this out to her, but she steadfastly refuses any mention of the word vaccine. Why not ? One can only fall back on the best indicator of all and.........follow the money.

It's interesting that she also has form in this regard. About 6/7 years ago she was involved in some controversy when she wrote a piece that claimed vaping was just as injurious to your health as smoking cigarettes was. Even when this claim was proved spurious, she wasn't for backing down, the Tobacco lobby must have been delighted with her support, although it remains unclear to me why she would be on their side. Any ideas ?

I have heard that she has quite a smoker's cough these days. Take your choice:- Fags, vapes, Covid or vaccine ---must be one of them

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Alarming news for the vaxxed amongst you...

https://www.theepochtimes.com/virus-...v4NPtYXKGCDPLg

[sinkov]

All well and good mon ami, but when you get Science Editors like Knapton at the Telegraph, deliberately suppressing this information, it's going to be a long slow job getting it into the public domain. Mark Steyn on GB News does his best, but the usual suspects are frantically trying to shut him up as well.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

All well and good mon ami, but when you get Science Editors like Knapton at the Telegraph, deliberately suppressing this information, it's going to be a long slow job getting it into the public domain. Mark Steyn on GB News does his best, but the usual suspects are frantically trying to shut him up as well.

Sadly, sinkov we can only speculate on why the newshounds are not all over this. Vaccine corruption, World Cup corruption, where's John Pilger when you need him?

[sinkov]

Sadly, sinkov we can only speculate on why the newshounds are not all over this. Vaccine corruption, World Cup corruption, where's John Pilger when you need him?

I know exactly why mon ami, what we're seeing is a re-run of the Sackler/Purdue Pharma/Oxycontin scandal in the USA, politicians, regulatory authorities, media. legal profession all bought off. Just for example, our regulatory body is the MHRA, if you think this is an independent, government funded regulator, think again, it does receive some government funding, but guess who also helps fund our regulatory body, have a look at Wiki,

"The MHRA is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care for the regulation of medical devices, whilst the costs of medicines regulation is met through fees from the pharmaceutical industry.[5] This has led to suggestions by some MPs that the MHRA is too reliant on industry, and so not fully independent.[6]

In 2017, the MHRA was awarded over £980,000 by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to fund its work with the foundation and the World Health Organization on improving safety monitoring for new medicines in low and middle-income countries.[7] In response to a Freedom of Information request, in 2022 the MHRA stated that approximately £3 million had been received from the Gates Foundation for a number of initiatives spanning several financial years.[8]"

Like I keep saying, follow the money.

You should read Empire of Pain mon ami, it's all in there, the whole steaming corrupt sewer, it's been done before, we're just getting a repeat now with the Covid vaccines.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...ictorian-novel