+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Class act on shirt sponsoring.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
    Woah, are you really going to use that?

    Please just remind me what's happened over the last 24 months?

    offffffffffffffffffffffffside lol
    We fell foul of using a depreciation method that is perfectly legal under FRS102 (source a UK Bank Manager friend of mine). Boro decided
    they didn't like it. An EFL disciplinary committee containing some accountants found us not guilty. On appeal, a committee containing zero accountants found us guilty. As it was an accounting matter, isn't that a tad questionable? Even more so when, after the case, the EFL introduced a rule to prevent that particular depreciation method being used....

    We got fined and instructed to change 3 season's accounts which led to the extra 9 point deduction. Would an appeal committee containing accountants have reached a different decision? I suspect they would.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,608
    Quote Originally Posted by MadAmster View Post
    We fell foul of using a depreciation method that is perfectly legal under FRS102 (source a UK Bank Manager friend of mine). Boro decided
    they didn't like it. An EFL disciplinary committee containing some accountants found us not guilty. On appeal, a committee containing zero accountants found us guilty. As it was an accounting matter, isn't that a tad questionable? Even more so when, after the case, the EFL introduced a rule to prevent that particular depreciation method being used....

    We got fined and instructed to change 3 season's accounts which led to the extra 9 point deduction. Would an appeal committee containing accountants have reached a different decision? I suspect they would.
    So you're blaming GP and Andy?

    MA, word it how you want , MM tried didling everyone, from the tax man to the players themselves.
    You got away with it for an extra year at the expense of others.
    Own it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
    So you're blaming GP and Andy?

    MA, word it how you want , MM tried didling everyone, from the tax man to the players themselves.
    HE got away with it for an extra year at the expense of others.
    A not guilty appeal decision would have seen us probably go into admin anyway but that -12 would have seen us still in the Championship.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,895
    Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
    So you're blaming GP and Andy?

    MA, word it how you want , MM tried didling everyone, from the tax man to the players themselves.
    You got away with it for an extra year at the expense of others.
    Own it.
    He didn't try diddling everyone, he did what a lot of business owners do which is use various accountancy methods to get the figures looking as they require. I mean even Tesco did a bit of number manipulating and got caught for it, and don't get me started on Philip Green and his shenanigans!

    The sale and lease back of the ground is a common thing, over half the care home companies in the UK work on that principle, not that i think its a good idea.

    What MA says is the bare facts as applied to the EFL penalty. In fact one could argue that that the interpretation of an accounting rule, which the appeal panel made, led to MM putting the club into administration and hence the financial fall out which affected the tax man and other creditors.

    It seems MM lost in the region of £125 million of his own money.

    I'm not defending the way he operated, it was clearly unsustainable, but its no different from how a lot of businesses operate until something unexpected, as in Covid - 19 comes along and basically destroys the income stream.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,608
    Quote Originally Posted by swaledale View Post
    He didn't try diddling everyone, he did what a lot of business owners do which is use various accountancy methods to get the figures looking as they require. I mean even Tesco did a bit of number manipulating and got caught for it, and don't get me started on Philip Green and his shenanigans!

    The sale and lease back of the ground is a common thing, over half the care home companies in the UK work on that principle, not that i think its a good idea.

    What MA says is the bare facts as applied to the EFL penalty. In fact one could argue that that the interpretation of an accounting rule, which the appeal panel made, led to MM putting the club into administration and hence the financial fall out which affected the tax man and other creditors.

    It seems MM lost in the region of £125 million of his own money.

    I'm not defending the way he operated, it was clearly unsustainable, but its no different from how a lot of businesses operate until something unexpected, as in Covid - 19 comes along and basically destroys the income stream.
    Of course he diddled others.
    Try the teams relegated, that didn't have his financial resources, to even attemp the diddle.
    But I'm sure they will take some comfort in the fact, that Tesco and P.Green are just as dodgy.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
    Of course he diddled others.
    Then why didn't he end up in Court?

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •