Absolutely Spike, - I am a shareholder too, - but we need to be mindful of the big picture (that we know of). There may well of course, - be another painting that we know nothing of!

Legitimate questions will always have their place, - but having a pot shot without any substance can be self defeating.

I'd rather see the AGM as an outlet for accepting the limitations of the club and asking legitimate questions like for example: how can the shareholders improve the financial situation? would the BOD accept new directors? If so, - how many, - and what sort of investment would be required? If there was a minimum amount of annual investment required, - (clutching at straws say £300K) could that be shared by up to 6 individuals (obviously meaning a £50K annual investment)? What about discussing the potential for fan representation? What amount of annual investment from a group would be appropriate to have a fan on the Board?

Rather than simply having a go at someone for the sake of it, - these would be exciting and legitimate questions which could prove highly illuminating (in more ways than one) but they may provide potential solutions for the club in terms of sharing the burden by the BOD and moving the club forward.

Clearly, - creating a larger BOD might make decisions more difficult to achieve, but a problem shared leads to far less stress, - and a time limit for Board meetings prevents protracted and unnecessary discussions.

These questions may be simply kicked into touch,- but they are a starter for ten.