
Originally Posted by
Notts78
There are some reet numpties on the Wrexham site. A couple moaning about us suggesting they are lucky late winners - not seen that on this thread (the one quoted) - in fact a few have said it’s likely to be the difference between us and Wrexham. Then one has put in that we have scored enough late lucky goals ourselves. I thought I had missed something so checked and it couldn’t be any further from the truth as minutes 75-90 is our least product with 9 yet it’s Wrexhams most productive with 16.
I’m in the camp that it’s the ability to go to the end and grind results out that could be the difference. I would never say a team is lucky to score late. Games last in excess of 90 minutes and you need the ability to score at any point. Some goals will be scruffier than others.
One stat I will say that Wrexham have over us, and there is luck involved (as the refs in the NL are sh1t) is the number of penalties they have been awarded. 6 v 3. Made a difference against Bromley and as it turned out today. Don’t know about the other 4, of which one was missed.
Checked - Mullin scored a pen at 3-3 v Barnet. Scored in injury time @1-1 v Oldham. Maidstone in a 5-0 difference.
So out of the 5 scored, 4 could be considered important and potentially game changing. They may well have deserved those penalties but I know we should have had a fair few more than the 3 awarded.