|
| + Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
I thought the two generally accepted most common forms of photo ID were driving licences and passports...even though my driving licence photo is at least 15 years old.
If that isn’t the case I can only foresee a huge reduction in those eligible to vote...on the subject of which...if your assertion that many voted to leave the EU as a ‘protest against non EU immigration’ is true, and I’m not disputing it, then perhaps there should be!
Here's a few little bits.
NI now has what it had pre Brexit. The majority of Tory MPs (ERG excepted) think it's great. Labour will back it. It will become Law unless the DUP scuppers it. It appears both the Tories and Labour are backing NI-in but leaving the rest of the UK Brexited. IMO that seems to point to Brexit having been a bad idea (that or a good one poorly executed). I'm still in the return the EU to a Free Trade Area camp but I'm aware I'll never get that.
Photo ID. ID has been compulsory for everybody over the age of 15 in NL since Feb 6th 1919. Since its introduction, the age limit has reduced to 14 and photoID has been added. It can be a passport, driving licence or an ID card issued by the local council. Police know who you are if they arrest you. Medical services know who you are if you are taken ill. They can contact family quicker and easier. As long as you're not up to no good, what's the problem. Google etc don't only know who you are, they also know where you are, how many bars, restaurants, shops etc you've been into. We are already monitored 24/7, is being able to prove your identity really an issue any more?
The proposed "new" NI protocol. Treating one part of the Union differently to another goes against the Act of Union. Does Sunak realise this new "idea" could give the SNP the bullet to kill the Act of Union and remove Scotland from it and then negotiate entry to the EU?
Well there you have it.
A landlord, sees that a company is offering to run/maintain/manage/ guarantee a long term lease to asylum seekers, at the expense of native low end renters who will have no where to live?
If you read the article clearly, you will see, it is seeking out family homes/ care homes/ residential+ student accomodation.
Greedy landlords will see this as an opportunity and turf out existing tennents in scarce areas.
All because of an EU ruling snow balling.
Brilliant.
Imagine if you owned a private house and suddenly next door was rented out to Serco, with 6 Albanian young men moving in?
Your life gets very worrying and your property price has suddenly dropped as well.
Last edited by Trickytreesreds; 02-03-2023 at 10:44 AM.
TTR: now you've baffled me here. The French, who are still members of the EU and subject to EU rules use container encampments. The UK are not allowed to do the same because of EU rules, despite not being in the EU or bound by their rules.
So if we accept such rules exist, why are they not being enforced in France? Or if we accept they don't exist (by virtue of French conduct) why do we "obey" them?
You appear to suggest that EU rules apply to non member states but not to their own members? Seems to me that the EU is getting blamed for something you just don't like - ie giving refugees top grade accomodation.
I can just see Mr and Mrs Van Der Berg in 1919 pondering how to use these new fangled cameras for their ID cards.
![]()