Dagenham v Wrexham tonight

[slack_pie]

The fact remains though Wrexham have been more fortunate than anybody else in getting favourable decisions for penelties that some never were when looking at the replays - question still remains - WHY ??

Have you seen every minute of all their games though? How many penalties should they have been awarded but weren't?

It's a fact that Mullin is an expert at drawing contact in the box and turning that into a penalty, I agree, but according to Wrexham fans, they've also been on the end of some poor decisions. I have no idea as I don't watch their games.

Even if they have been luckier than us over the course of the season (I have no idea if that is true or not), it doesn't mean the only explanation is corruption. **** happens.

[Davy500]

Have you seen every minute of all their games though? How many penalties should they have been awarded but weren't?

It's a fact that Mullin is an expert at drawing contact in the box and turning that into a penalty, I agree, but according to Wrexham fans, they've also been on the end of some poor decisions. I have no idea as I don't watch their games.

Even if they have been luckier than us over the course of the season (I have no idea if that is true or not), it doesn't mean the only explanation is corruption. **** happens.

Quite possible they have not been given penalties in games where they were winning comfortably enough. I am talking about the games that were draws, and penalties that on looking at replays never were, and it's happened in enough of those games to help them gain significantly more points.
You are correct in saying that Mullin is an excellent player with lots of league experience, so it is quite possible that he can con referees but when the same referee gives them a penalty for nothing and he then sees Langstaff hauled to the ground blatantly, for me that is bias. Being crap does just not cover that degree of incompetence.