D4l

[scottg]

Hopefully this helps anyone on the D4L Board wondering why a significant number of the non committee members present at their 2022 AGM are less than happy.

The AGM was on Saturday Nov 19th, there was much discussion and debate with everyone in attendance ending up pretty much on the same page, there was significant genuine concern and time was considered to be a significant factor. There was a show of hands in response to a question raised by The Chair to see how many people present were ‘happy with current direction of the football club’ - no hands were raised.

It was also stated that D4L were ‘planning to nominate a primary representative this year’. There were six weeks left of 2022 at the time, we are now more than two months into 2023. The much discussed outstanding question of the clubs position re respect of the entrenched rights D4L have c/o their Class A shares is also outstanding.

On the face of it they appear to be no nearer getting what they believe to be what is due to them and have significantly lowered the bar post AGM having expressed a view in their latest update to members that significant progress has been made by way of Greg Fenton agreeing to take questions from them.

The can continues to get kicked down the road, attending these meetings and flogging the usual topics to death has become quite monotonous for those of us who have been doing so for quite a long time now ….. new faces or not.

Good luck to the folk currently taking the responsibility, none of the criticism I read is personal, I don’t believe there is any problem with any of the individuals they are all well known, well meaning and well thought of within our core support.

It just appears that the same old song has been played once too often for some.