In case you didn't know, your hard work has been appreciated on the Wrexham board ncfcog. Here's one comment:
"That's a great and very professional read. Unbiased too! Wouldn't it be great to have something like that next season".
In case you didn't know, your hard work has been appreciated on the Wrexham board ncfcog. Here's one comment:
"That's a great and very professional read. Unbiased too! Wouldn't it be great to have something like that next season".
A couple more:
"That is superb, it's the only stats based analysis I've seen that is both informative AND interesting to read".
"Excellent unbiased read".
PPDA stands for Passes allowed per defensive action. It essentially looks at how many passes you allow the opposition when they are attacking before they lose possession. It's a metric used to identify a teams pressing but it can be skewed at times because a team could really pres Notts but the quality we have on the ball means we could still keep possession for long periods despite their press which would suggest their press is lacking when it isn't, it just isn't effective.
Wealdstone report . . .
https://www.nottscountystats.com/pos...t-wealdstone-h
Wrexham stats are up and guess what, we had loads of possession . . . https://www.nottscountystats.com/post/report-wrexham-a
Nearly 76% possession, that's madness We had more of the ball at Wrexham than we did at home agaainst Wealdstone!
Great stuff as usual, but I expected Wrexham's Xg to be above ours. I suppose it was until the missed penalty, which must have a big say in the percentages given the 80% chance of scoring.
I think our downfall was in the Xde (expected defensive errors). Even though their first goal was very questionable due to the foul on Bajrami, the other two were down to dire defensive play from us. We might have a case for deserving a draw, but if this was a boxing match there was only one winner on points, and it wasn't us.