O/T:- ⚠️Impressed with the leadership [The UK Party Politics Thread]

[magpie_mania]

Best quote I heard today, from some political commentator, was, 'You shouldn't think of him as a serial liar, it is just that he gets bored by the truth' whatever that means.

Nadine has said that any Tory who votes in favour on Monday should be kicked out of the party.

You couldn't make this up.

[Elite_Pie]

Best quote I heard today, from some political commentator, was, 'You shouldn't think of him as a serial liar, it is just that he gets bored by the truth' whatever that means.

Nadine has said that any Tory who votes in favour on Monday should be kicked out of the party.

You couldn't make this up.

It seems Conservative MPs are split on Monday's vote. I think they fall into 3 categories:

1. Those who vote in favour have morals.
2. Those who vote against are complicit in the lies and deceit.
3. Those who abstain are cowards more concerned with their own future than honesty.

I don't know if the votes will be made public, but we already know our Notts supporting MP (Brendan Clarke-Smith, the 'right honourable' member for Bassetlaw) will fall into category 2. On past history, I would guess that Darren Henry who represents me and Soccerman is likely to go for category 3.

[Jeekay56]

So one lying, cowardly hypocrite gets what he deserves. Let's hope the other one gets the same.

I'm talking about Trump of course.

This is one of the parties the Met (thoroughly) investigated! No-one was charged and at least one of these people made Johnson's honours list. You couldn't make this up, unless you're a tory. They appear to be pretty good at making things up!

[Old_pie]

This is one of the parties the Met (thoroughly) investigated! No-one was charged and at least one of these people made Johnson's honours list. You couldn't make this up, unless you're a tory. They appear to be pretty good at making things up!

Give them a break, they're only following the standards set by their leader.

[maddogslater]

The hole lock down was a load of bollox, not that I care for these pieces of sh1t, or the Labour lot of captured muppets either.
Best politician I've heard in a long time is Robert Kennedy Jr on the Rogan show, big respect.

[jackal2]

The whole lock down was a load of bollox, not that I care for these pieces of sh1t, or the Labour lot of captured muppets either.

Difficult to disagree.

The obvious conclusion to take from videos such as the one above is that those involved, and their political leaders, did not privately believe that the severity of the lockdown was as necessary as they publicly said it was, as demonstrated by their own actions. So why did they advocate such policies?

A lot of politicians these days are getting themselves into strife by saying words and advocating policies recommended to them by experts/think tanks/focus groups rather than saying what they actually believe in their heart (if they even know what a heartfelt belief is!), and that's why they get caught out when their private actions inevitably don't match their public statements.

What's the point of going into politics if you're not actually going to say and stand by what you believe?

It's a rhetorical question. The answer is that we have a raft of people who now think the main point of politics is not to change/shape the world to the way they believe it should be, but rather, to provide them with a lucrative career. I can't imagine the likes of (e.g.) Margaret Thatcher or Tony Benn routinely advocating policies that they didn't believe in their heart, but these days we've got a situation where unelected officials can very easily manipulate the public's elected representatives to parrot whatever they recommend.

In Civil Service parlance, a lot of modern politicians seem to be very easily "professionally guided" and are no doubt considered "a joy to work with", while the few remaining awkward sods who actually have some core beliefs and refuse to compromise are "bullies".

[Old_pie]

Difficult to disagree.

The obvious conclusion to take from videos such as the one above is that those involved, and their political leaders, did not privately believe that the severity of the lockdown was as necessary as they publicly said it was, as demonstrated by their own actions. So why did they advocate such policies?

A lot of politicians these days are getting themselves into strife by saying words and advocating policies recommended to them by experts/think tanks/focus groups rather than saying what they actually believe in their heart (if they even know what a heartfelt belief is!), and that's why they get caught out when their private actions inevitably don't match their public statements.

What's the point of going into politics if you're not actually going to say and stand by what you believe?

It's a rhetorical question. The answer is that we have a raft of people who now think the main point of politics is not to change/shape the world to the way they believe it should be, but rather, to provide them with a lucrative career. I can't imagine the likes of (e.g.) Margaret Thatcher or Tony Benn routinely advocating policies that they didn't believe in their heart, but these days we've got a situation where unelected officials can very easily manipulate the public's elected representatives to parrot whatever they recommend.

In Civil Service parlance, a lot of modern politicians seem to be very easily "professionally guided" and are no doubt considered "a joy to work with", while the few remaining awkward sods who actually have some core beliefs and refuse to compromise are "bullies".

Well either as you say or they really are stupid. By stupid I mean that today's politicians are incapable of practical comprehensions.

On Tw@tter:

John Redwood
@johnredwood
How can some water companies need to ration water when there is more demand on a few hot dry days? The bakers do not have to ration hot cross buns when many want them at Easter.

[upthemaggies]

The hole lock down was a load of bollox, not that I care for these pieces of sh1t, or the Labour lot of captured muppets either.
Best politician I've heard in a long time is Robert Kennedy Jr on the Rogan show, big respect.

Yep.

Haven't listened to the Rogan podcast but have heard numerous RK interviews and whilst I'm sure he's far from perfect, he has to be the best option from what's currently on offer.

As for people getting angry with MPs having their get togethers. I'm angry with the media taking the moral high ground with this because it was their job to investigate and provide the public with the true facts and not be bribed with ad revenue to push the propaganda and fear that got people to comply with the insanity for so long.

[countygump]

The hole lock down was a load of bollox, not that I care for these pieces of sh1t, or the Labour lot of captured muppets either.
Best politician I've heard in a long time is Robert Kennedy Jr on the Rogan show, big respect.

You have a point. It seems the "swedish model" was as successful, if not even more so, than ours. But that comes with a stonkingly huge dollop of hindsight that unfortunately, wasn't available at the time. All Govs can do is accept, (and trust in), the best medical advice available to them at that time. As some smart ar5e once said, "It's easy to be wise after the event, but it's wiser to be cautious before it".


https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...says-scientist

[upthemaggies]

All Govs can do is accept, (and trust in), the best medical advice available to them at that time.

There was plenty of scientists advising taking a route akin to the Swedish model, which our government initially favoured. but they were all ultimately censored and dismissed as cranks, probably after the bribes from one of the most powerful institutions on Earth were increased.