Quote Originally Posted by BanjoPie View Post
Sorry UTM but unless you supply some type of evidence then all you say is just opinions , hearsay or fake-news stories. As I said, provide the evidence and I will genuinely read it and if convinced, I will join the ban wagon.
What do you want me to do? Perform a live autopsy on a zoom chat?

We all know how it works, stats and graphs that back up your claim are evidence, stats and graphs that don't can be dismissed with the quote ""Lies, damned lies, and statistics", Trading stats, graphs and links back and forth also just gets boring and tedious for everybody else, see Andy v Jampie on the Ukraine thread. Anything that isn't BBC/Guardian is dismissed as Right Wing and if it's not right wing MSM then it's dismissed as "just somebody on the internet, you must be a flat earther too, ha ha ha".
Above all it requires me going back and doing the work and finding the material and interviews I did a year ago when the battle has now been won.

Mostly my opinion is based on trusting the advice of an elderly relative I've only got to know properly in recent years who spent his life working as a psychiatrist who therefore knows a thing or two as to how pharma operates and he was quite dismayed how many of the family buckled once vax passports came in.

I did wonder in the middle of it all, who - if we're all still here in decade's time - would be the last person on here to defend pharma and the WHO etc as it all begins to unravel and the truth finally begins to come out. After your last post I can probably rule you out, it's probably going to be Jampie or the WEF chap.