Nigel Farage has had his Bank account cancelled

[On Balance]

Sheep, Lemmings…….don’t you just love ‘em?

Not!

No conspiracy here, simple banking business protocol it appears. There are a few sheep agreed, and there is many old washer woman who love nothing more than to title tat over the garden fence looking for the worst in every situation.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-66097039

[mickd1961]

No conspiracy here, simple banking business protocol it appears. There are a few sheep agreed, and there is many old washer woman who love nothing more than to title tat over the garden fence looking for the worst in every situation.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-66097039

Not simple at all.

Banks deal with plenty or corrupt and un ethical big business and are happy to handle the massive money from hideous regimes such as the Saudi’s and the Chinese.

They then make a decision like this against an individual just to make themselves look good with the U.K. public and pretend they have ethics.

How pathetic and transparent is that!

[On Balance]

Not simple at all.

Banks deal with plenty or corrupt and un ethical big business and are happy to handle the massive money from hideous regimes such as the Saudi’s and the Chinese.

They then make a decision like this against an individual just to make themselves look good with the U.K. public and pretend they have ethics.

How pathetic and transparent is that!

How do you know that is what has happened here though. You are perhaps making an assumption I’d guess. Have you any real evidence to suggest NF has been selected just to make the bank look good with the U.K. public and make it look as though they have ethics.

NF does not have the funds in that bank to be in a position to hold an account or accounts with it. Most banks, even high street banks, put minimum limits on accounts that provide superior benefits.

As for unethical big business, well it of course goes on. Big business or small business, they all continue to trade with the Chinese and the Saudis, despite the atrocious atrocities they commit with regard to human rights issues. Consumers are also guilty as they continue to purchase goods from businesses who support those unethical nations.

[baggieal]

How do you know that is what has happened here though. You are perhaps making an assumption I’d guess. Have you any real evidence to suggest NF has been selected just to make the bank look good with the U.K. public and make it look as though they have ethics.

NF does not have the funds in that bank to be in a position to hold an account or accounts with it. Most banks, even high street banks, put minimum limits on accounts that provide superior benefits.

As for unethical big business, well it of course goes on. Big business or small business, they all continue to trade with the Chinese and the Saudis, despite the atrocious atrocities they commit with regard to human rights issues. Consumers are also guilty as they continue to purchase goods from businesses who support those unethical nations.

Your making an assumption that old washer women title tat over the garden fence. Perhaps you and the mrs or boyfriend have a low picket fence!!!’

[On Balance]

Your making an assumption that old washer women title tat over the garden fence. Perhaps you and the mrs or boyfriend have a low picket fence!!!’

Not sure what you are referring to, please explain!

[mickd1961]

How do you know that is what has happened here though. You are perhaps making an assumption I’d guess. Have you any real evidence to suggest NF has been selected just to make the bank look good with the U.K. public and make it look as though they have ethics.

NF does not have the funds in that bank to be in a position to hold an account or accounts with it. Most banks, even high street banks, put minimum limits on accounts that provide superior benefits.

As for unethical big business, well it of course goes on. Big business or small business, they all continue to trade with the Chinese and the Saudis, despite the atrocious atrocities they commit with regard to human rights issues. Consumers are also guilty as they continue to purchase goods from businesses who support those unethical nations.

Wow, you really know it all don’t you?

Anything made in China in your house.

[On Balance]

Wow, you really know it all don’t you?

Anything made in China in your house.

Well, if you had read my post at 23, I believe that would give you a clue, as I am a consumer. That said if I know a product is made in China before I purchase I do tend to avoid the purchase.

I don’t know it all. I just had a different opinion to you based on what I read. You appear, unfortunately, to take it personally. Since I have been posting on here you have continually tried to make me feel unwelcome as has your good ally Al.

He has just made a comment about my ***uality without knowing me and not providing an explanation as to why he questions someone gender when the thread has no bearing on such.

He also accuses me of being another poster and claimed I said things that he was unable to support.

I take no issue with either of you. I am a Baggie and I have no wish to fall out because we have differing views.

If you or BaggieAl would prefer I do not post on here then let me know and I will leave it to the both of you.

[baggieal]

Not sure what you are referring to, please explain!

Dogs do speak but only to those who know how to listen!

[On Balance]

Dogs do speak but only to those who know how to listen!

Ah yes…………of course. I think a dog once said sausages.

Anyway, I wouldn’t call you a dog.

[mickd1961]

Well, if you had read my post at 23, I believe that would give you a clue, as I am a consumer. That said if I know a product is made in China before I purchase I do tend to avoid the purchase.

I don’t know it all. I just had a different opinion to you based on what I read. You appear, unfortunately, to take it personally. Since I have been posting on here you have continually tried to make me feel unwelcome as has your good ally Al.

He has just made a comment about my ***uality without knowing me and not providing an explanation as to why he questions someone gender when the thread has no bearing on such.

He also accuses me of being another poster and claimed I said things that he was unable to support.

I take no issue with either of you. I am a Baggie and I have no wish to fall out because we have differing views.

If you or BaggieAl would prefer I do not post on here then let me know and I will leave it to the both of you.

You are the problem, not me or AL or any of the regulars who’ve been on here for years.

It’s always you who starts the personal stuff.

Show me an instance where you’ve started a thread and I’ve jumped on you and got personal?

Good luck with that by the way.


I only retaliate these days, I don’t start antagonism as I haven’t the headspace for it anymore.

Why would you continue to post on any platform you feel uncomfortable on?

If you want to go then go but don’t be such a drama queen about it!

Your choice, I couldn’t give a hoot either way.