I'm not seeing anyone talking themselves up as being morally superior. But as I've said before, if we're serious about climate change, it's not about an individual purity competition but about structural level changes. While there's a role for individuals thinking about their personal contribution, ultimately responding to climate change needs governmental and international policy changes and proper leadership.
The charge of hypocrisy is an easy cop out for those with no interest in changing the status quo. (You like immigrants so much put them in your house etc).
Of course issues like immigration and climate change can’t be tackled on an individual basis, only at governmental level. I’m going to see my daughter in Malaysia in a few weeks, I would have no problem if those flights were stopped/taxed out of existence.
Never heard of it so looked it up.
Lack of space leading to overpopulation and breakdown of social order, then subsequently senseless violence, cannibalism, males stop protecting their females, mothers abandon their young prematurely, deviant behaviour becomes the norm, and finally individuals burrow into the ground to avoid this **** show and live like hermits without reproducing until the species eventually goes extinct.
To clarify, this is your expected outcome for the nice version of human extinction, the one that you are zen about, and you are surprised people ask you to explain this position. Do you feel that's an accurate summary?
No I don't, I think the most important part of that experiment that's worth highlighting, being relevant to where we're at right now, is the narcissism and hyper***ual activity, followed by a***uality," bit.
With that in mind, perhaps we're already drawing towards the conclusion of this experiment and the most unpleasant parts are already behind us, if we can avoid the blinding light / melting skin / lethal radiation dose scenario.
Practically all creatures that have ever been have met their end in suffering. That's life and the physical world. Most either starve, succumb to sickness or are picked off by predators. We don't live in a Cbeebies world where everything is nice and cuddly.
Not really. There's no real need to drastically alter lifestyles, "just" switch out a few energy sources. And it's in full swing right now. There's still transitional costs to bear and the fossil fuel companies, their paid shills and useful idiots are making all the noise they can, but honestly I think the majority just aren't listening anymore.
Could all backslide again. The Trump years in the US were particularly bad for that, hopefully we don't see a repeat.
Ok so the mouse thing was more about social commentary of modern day Western society than about human extinction from one of the scenarios we were talking about.
And we could already be past the no space to live in / senseless violence and cannibalism phase.
I'm not really able to follow your train of thought on this one.