Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
So it's a law that can be used to stop online misinformation campaigns being used to manipulate elections?

I can see the value in that, but how it would work in practice isn't clear given the speed that misinformation can be spread online and the difficulty in stopping it.

A law like that might have come in handy in the UK prior to the Brexit referendum. I'm not sure what it has to do with vaccines though.
It’s not just the speed of information that’s the problem it’s who monitors the information.

We’ve already established that we have different views on things so who gets shut down?

Also on a religion based argument who gets to say which god is the greatest. When you see the American constitution you’d say they’d side with Christianity.

The federal bank in the USA is an independent institution. A hell of Americans don’t realise this. It was started in 1913 I believe and had wealthy opponents to it. All those opponents were said to be on the maiden voyage of The titanic. The owner of the company that constructed the Titanic was Rockefeller who went on to be a share holder in the Federal Reserve. Another coincidence? Is it true or a lie?

The more people look into things the more people find out. If the internet is censored to a large degree how can questions be asked?
We’ve seen how politics are being played today, the supposed infiltration by the WEF ( there words) into cabinets around the world. The EU, the UN, the WHO whose funding is 85% from outside sources including Rochafeller and Bill Gates and is headed up by a guy that ran a terrorist group.

If people aren’t allowed to ask questions about this then we are really moving towards a totalitarian dictatorship run by unelected elites.