|
| + Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
That's a difficult question. Should a bit of the huge pile of money in this country go to junior doctors, or should we keep giving it to underperforming chief executives who set their own bonuses which could triple their salary?
I lose a lot of sleep wrestling with that one.
Bring back Matron!
There are a lot of genuine and pressing demands on any huge pile of money that can be found, so once you get your hands on it then it needs to be distributed wisely and not just on the loudest mouth. I hope working that out doesn't cause you to lose too much more sleep.
Anyhow, it seems as if both parties have grown a Magic Tree as lots of things are going to get done with no increase in taxation and I think the cost of fixing things is way above what the underperforming chief execs (or indeed even Harry Arter) earn. I just hope that the Tree's yields are good and some thieving magpies don't peck at it.
Either way we're in need of at least 10 years of sensible government before a feel good factor can return, and even if world events allow it I don't see it happening, but then I'm unlikely to be around to see if I'm right.
Last edited by Old_pie; 29-05-2024 at 08:50 PM. Reason: too
I'm not so sure. This is from the ONS government website:
"Wealth is unevenly distributed between individuals in Great Britain, with the wealthiest 10% estimated to hold around half of all wealth, primarily in the form of private pensions and property. The UK has very high inequality of income compared to other developed countries; the 9th most unequal incomes of 38 OECD countries. The UK’s wealth inequality is much more severe than income inequality, with the top fifth taking 36% of the country’s income and 63% of the country’s wealth, while the bottom fifth have only 8% of the income and only 0.5% of the wealth according to the Office for National Statistics".
Somewhere in between there is a fair balance and I'm not clever enough to know exactly where. Although I will absolve Harry Arter of any blame, he was well worth every penny he 'earned' on the south bank of the Trent.
I think the movie 'Carry On At Your Convenience" portrays what work life was like in the last 60s, early 70's, as earlier stated, very well (although I wasn't working then). However, history has been re-written and for those of you that are easily offended we can't talk about Carry On films and their statement on society, because you'll all think that Talbot Rothwell was a racist and a ***ist - RIP satirical humour.
I mean, how many of you could watch Love Thy Neighbour without thinking it is racist against the Reynolds family?
Last edited by Lullapie; 30-05-2024 at 01:49 AM.
For a while in New Zealand I was running a plastic plant pot business. We were New Zealand's sole agent for this range of plant pots. Apart from Holland, New Zealand is one of the largest growers per capita in the world.
Anyway, the plant pot manufacturer was based in Melbourne, Australia. We were bringing over 1 -2 40ft containers each week. I always had to get my order in by the Wednesday for delivery the week after. Once we had a late, but important order from a big New Zealand grower. I emailed through at 6.00am Thursday morning as an urgent addition. It was for a full container load.
I had an email back about lunchtime (time difference) saying that although they could process the order, it had missed being dispatched on the Friday, because under Union rules, the warehouse couldn't pack containers on any days apart from Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday.
Now, all you die hard Trade Unionists, tell me what was the point in that? You know what? I bet the Union's decision made the Chief Executive underperform.