+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 47

Thread: O/T Andy Burnham on Mank incident

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by clarkey1974 View Post
    One criminal act doesn”t nullify another criminal act even if they are connected with the same incident.people will have seen two videos,there will be more things that people haven”t seen,plus the body cam footage which will provide further evidence and audible evidence.
    Now we get a long drawn out trial so that the legal people can generate maximum cash

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,630
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    Now we get a long drawn out trial so that the legal people can generate maximum cash
    What do you think we should do? Show the videos and have a public vote by text - £1 per entry plus your normal service provider charge?

    I'm sure the police officer would have been found guilty on the popular vote after the first video.

    Fool.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,751
    Quote Originally Posted by ilikecarling View Post
    Enlighten me then genius?
    Why don’t you enlighten me genius? Tell me why you think if it would have been a white person they would have been shot?

    Also tell me why you think white people obey the laws of this country? Are there no white people in prison?

    You really do spout bollcks on here.

    At the risk of sounding like Roly, I’ve just watched Howdy’s video and it was pretty convincing. I would like Piers Morgan to watch it and provide the feedback from his research into the case (at the time) so I can get the full story.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2023
    Posts
    1,573
    Same old, same old - in terms of how this has trickled through and subsequently been thrown around like a shining example of what numerous people already thought about others.

    First video: Clearly needs context, but no officer should be stamping on anyone's head.
    Second video: Clearly needs context, but nobody should feel they're ever okay to swing at police officers.

    Loads more will follow, and plenty of people will us and abuse what's out there so far to whip up hysteria. It's pretty silly that the instant gratification mode kicks in and everyone 'solves the case' before seeing the full story.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5,665
    Quote Originally Posted by UlleyMiller View Post
    Same old, same old - in terms of how this has trickled through and subsequently been thrown around like a shining example of what numerous people already thought about others.

    First video: Clearly needs context, but no officer should be stamping on anyone's head.
    Second video: Clearly needs context, but nobody should feel they're ever okay to swing at police officers.

    Loads more will follow, and plenty of people will us and abuse what's out there so far to whip up hysteria. It's pretty silly that the instant gratification mode kicks in and everyone 'solves the case' before seeing the full story.
    There's two earlier incidents that will provide the context. If it's out there people will try and 'solve' the case. It's an whodunnit presented in the format of Pulp Fiction. I'm happy with myself actually. Video 2 plays out roughly as I thought it would. Hope that's not too silly. I've got theories about No.1 and No.2 altercations too. Is it alright if I mention that to the missus even before the full story comes out?

    A Greater Manchester Police constable has been advised he is under criminal investigation for assault over the incident, the IOPC said on Friday.

    On Saturday, Manchester Evening News published new footage believed to be of the preceding events.

    The video appears to shows a group of people standing by ticket machines in Terminal Two (T2) and a man in a light blue outfit is facing one of the machines.

    It appears three officers approach him from behind and try to restrain him, with a male officer seemingly pushing his head down.

    Another man, wearing a dark t-shirt, appears to grab the male officer and the two start to throw punches at one another.

    The male officer seems to lower to the ground as the man repeatedly strikes him.

    Meanwhile a female officer is restraining the man in blue, but he appears to break free and strike her and another female officer, with one ending up on the ground.

    The male officer then seems to point his taser at the man in a dark t-shirt before the man in blue runs at him from behind.

    They appear to grapple until the man in blue lies still on the ground, face-down, and a woman kneels by his side.

    The officer then appears to kick and then stamp on his head, which was shown in the footage already widely circulated.

    Greater Manchester Police has opened a public portal for more footage and it is appealing for witnesses to three incidents.

    The first is "an altercation between passengers" from Qatar Airways flight QR023 that arrived at 7.20pm, which they said may have taken place on the flight or T2 baggage hall.

    There was then a "violent altercation involving members of the public" in T2 at about 8.22pm, GMP said.

    At 8.28pm at the terminal's car park pay point area three police officers were assaulted and left with head injuries including a broken nose, it added.

    After Manchester Evening News published the latest footage, Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham said in a statement: "As I said on Thursday, this is a complicated situation with two sides to it.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2023
    Posts
    1,573
    Quote Originally Posted by howdydoo View Post
    There's two earlier incidents that will provide the context. If it's out there people will try and 'solve' the case. It's an whodunnit presented in the format of Pulp Fiction. I'm happy with myself actually. Video 2 plays out roughly as I thought it would. Hope that's not too silly. I've got theories about No.1 and No.2 altercations too. Is it alright if I mention that to the missus even before the full story comes out?
    Okay....

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    2,068
    I’ve watched the banned video by Tommy Robinson and like someone as said it makes interesting viewing. Why ban the video ? Just show it on one of the main tv stations and let the nation decide if it’s *******s or if there is an element of truth in the video. It will be interesting if more posters on this site watch it to give their impressions.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2023
    Posts
    1,573
    Quote Originally Posted by Stovicmiller View Post
    I’ve watched the banned video by Tommy Robinson and like someone as said it makes interesting viewing. Why ban the video ? Just show it on one of the main tv stations and let the nation decide if it’s *******s or if there is an element of truth in the video. It will be interesting if more posters on this site watch it to give their impressions.
    Is this available on a mainstream news site?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5,665
    Quote Originally Posted by UlleyMiller View Post
    Is this available on a mainstream news site?
    Not in the UK

    You know that's not possible

    https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...ending%20prick

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    42,102
    Quote Originally Posted by Stovicmiller View Post
    I’ve watched the banned video by Tommy Robinson and like someone as said it makes interesting viewing. Why ban the video ? Just show it on one of the main tv stations and let the nation decide if it’s *******s or if there is an element of truth in the video. It will be interesting if more posters on this site watch it to give their impressions.
    Me too!

    Watched it and I can't understand why the school was closed down.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •