Stabbings

[Robus]

We could sort out starvation in Africa within a month if we had the inclination. We don't, so we won't.

You Brits did a fair job of it once already. In the 19th century, Islamic jihads killed and enslaved millions across Africa, from Senegal to the Red Sea. Then Europeans colonized and put a stop to it. Famine and violence diminished. Death rates fell. Life expectancy increased by 15 years. Population doubled. (The same happened in India under British rule).

Then the Europeans left, and the jihadists are returning. Millions are threatened once again.

[army88]

Please stop calling me a racist BT before it starts to twine me.
I am not racist - never have been grew up playing football with African Asian - Indian - polish the list goes on and I treat everyone with the same respect as I’d expect myself, the last thing I will ever be is racist.

If you can’t debate / comment on subjects like this without resorting to pointing fingers at people - you should t comment.

If you look back on every single post I make not one of them is derogatory to you in an any subject - I may disagree yes but not personal slurs.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Please stop calling me a racist BT before it starts to twine me.
I am not racist - never have been grew up playing football with African Asian - Indian - polish the list goes on and I treat everyone with the same respect as I’d expect myself, the last thing I will ever be is racist.

If you can’t debate / comment on subjects like this without resorting to pointing fingers at people - you should t comment.

If you look back on every single post I make not one of them is derogatory to you in an any subject - I may disagree yes but not personal slurs.

What are you on about? Where have I called you a racist?

The rules of the game in this country are if I slander Israel I'm an anti-Semite, if you slander Muslims you are deemed Islamophobic.

Not my rules, it's just the way it is.

I put on record on here I actually think you are a fairly decent chap for a Yorkshireman.

[army88]

The racists say the same about Africans.

Maybe I read it wrong but I thought this suggested I was racist.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Maybe I read it wrong but I thought this suggested I was racist.

You read too much into stuff my mate. I dare not say anything now otherwise it might instigate another knock on the front door.

[Robus]

You read too much into stuff my mate. I dare not say anything now otherwise it might instigate another knock on the front door.

The left labels. The point, army88, is to make you do as you did: "No! I'M NOT A RACIST." You dance to their tune. The day is coming when we will sneer at those labels.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

The left labels. The point, army88, is to make you do as you did: "No! I'M NOT A RACIST." You dance to their tune. The day is coming when we will sneer at those labels.

Speaking of labels Robus, according to a dictionary white supremacy houses the belief that white people constitute a superior race and should therefore dominate society, typically to the exclusion or detriment of other racial and ethnic groups, in particular black or Jewish people. I’d swap the “Jewish people” bit and substitute “brown Muslim people” for the explanation to make any sort of sense to me.

"White Supremacists" is a label and I reckon I could easily file one or two I read across social media under such a tag.

[sinkov]

White Supremacists now mon ami ? We've seen the fictitious Far Right melt, as you so eloquently put it, into the ether. How many more bogey men do you Lefties have up your sleeve to frighten us with ?

[Swissclaret]

White Supremacists now mon ami ? We've seen the fictitious Far Right melt, as you so eloquently put it, into the ether. How many more bogey men do you Lefties have up your sleeve to frighten us with ?

Don’t forget, sinkov, that whilst no names were mentioned it was said that some people of this site are “racist bigots” and “tools”. Quite a triumvirate of accolades when you add in white supremacists.

That is the left/woke answer to debate - calling people names like children in a schoolyard when they cannot support their opinions.

[Robus]

Don’t forget, sinkov, that whilst no names were mentioned it was said that some people of this site are “racist bigots” and “tools”. Quite a triumvirate of accolades when you add in white supremacists.

That is the left/woke answer to debate - calling people names like children in a schoolyard when they cannot support their opinions.

Not the language of children, but of leftist totalitarianism. In order to destroy real or imagined opponents, you must label them: Trotskyists, Kulaks, fascists. Then they mobilized legions of party faithful in the media, education, bureaucracy to propagate these labels throughout the culture, and to amass growing lists of enemies to apply them to. It's the decentralized, entrepreneurial nature of totalitarian repression that makes it so fearsome. Once the leaders issue the marching orders in the form of labels, the busy beavers in every locality will push the repression into the deepest corners of society. This mechanism killed 10 million people in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, many more in China under Mao. It is fully in play in Europe today.

Labels like "white supremacist," "racist" are the babbling of totalitarians. Not 30 years ago, Tony Blair vowed to "rub the noses" of the British people in diversity but pushing mass immigration on a scale that nobody wanted. He did so in order to launch a culture war, using immigration as a weapon against domestic political opponents. On every occasion, the British people voted to stop the invasion. On every occasion, they got more. The result is a growing nightmare whereby the Native English are becoming a minority in their own land, their liberties curtailed, their institutions debased, their history denigrated, their sons and daughters discriminated against for jobs and services, their children murdered or groomed, and their protests reviled as "racist" or "white supremacist."

Do you recall what Cromwell said of the Scottish Engagement at the trial of Charles I? The king had engaged Scots to cross the border and march against his English subjects. For Cromwell, this was "a more prodigious treason than any that had been perfected before; because the former quarrel was that Englishmen might rule over one another; this to vassalize us to a foreign nation."