Quote Originally Posted by Boomerangpie View Post
So it has to be reactive not proactive and it has to be like for like or it doesn’t count. Ok, you win.

He was brought in to offer another edge to our attacking play whilst Langstaff was here and he did. That doesn’t automatically disqualify him from being a replacement when as expected our top scorer moved up the leagues.

The cynicism aimed towards the owners this past couple of months is truly baffling. Just shows no matter how well they do, how much good they do, how much they spend on the club it won’t stop those who are truly committed to cynicism and pessimism.
Jatta was bought in because we had a distinct lack of presence up front. He was a proactive signing, but he was not a Langstaff replacement