+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Thread: Careless Red Tories

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    8,333
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    Whatever the provocation? Really? Looks bad I agree, but there’s no footage of what preceded Amesbury’s probable/possible first punch.
    In a previous incident Ben Stokes’ behaviour looked dreadful…then the truth came out and told a very different story.
    Starmer has done all he can…for now. He’s suspended Amesbury subject to further investigation. Such investigation will be conducted by the police, not Starmer, and rightly so. It happened on Saturday and the guy had been suspended by Monday morning. What more can you expect at this stage?
    If it proves to be an entirely unjustified attack I imagine Amesbury’s political career will be finished and he’ll probably go to prison…again rightly so.
    Time for you and Andy to control your excitement and wait a while until the matter has been dealt with by the police/courts.
    I’m not excited rA, although I think Tricky has a point about relative severity of and speed of sentencing in other cases in recent months but as you say, in this case we’ll see.

    However, never condone the application of a sucker punch, I won’t attach any links to vids but it’s a cowards way out of a situation and potentially lethal

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    14,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_Faber View Post
    I’m not excited rA, although I think Tricky has a point about relative severity of and speed of sentencing in other cases in recent months but as you say, in this case we’ll see.

    However, never condone the application of a sucker punch, I won’t attach any links to vids but it’s a cowards way out of a situation and potentially lethal
    Well you seemed to be, in your haste, this morning. Seemed to be more like the TTR ‘school of posting’, after all you are, allegedly, opposed to such posts.
    As I say…wait and see. The case is already confused by the fact that this MP would appear to have been being stalked by another similarly aged man for some time.
    ‘Curiouser and curiouser’…doubtless it’ll all ‘come out in the wash’ and he’ll suffer the consequences or be exonerated.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    8,333
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    Well you seemed to be, in your haste, this morning. Seemed to be more like the TTR ‘school of posting’, after all you are, allegedly, opposed to such posts.
    We seem to have gone full circle. Now I post a thread identifying a chink in the armour of HMG (post #1) of which lets face it there were dozens, maybe hundreds during the Conservative period in office, and your response starts with a personal attack on the OP (in this case me) (post #5)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    14,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_Faber View Post
    We seem to have gone full circle. Now I post a thread identifying a chink in the armour of HMG (post #1) of which lets face it there were dozens, maybe hundreds during the Conservative period in office, and your response starts with a personal attack on the OP (in this case me) (post #5)
    ‘Personal attack’? What rot and it’s not a ‘chink in anyone’s armour’ either.

    It’s a thoroughly unsavoury incident that there may or may not be more to which now needs police investigation.

    You and Tricky seem to have got your respective knickers in a twist over it and it just amused me that you of all people, who is so opposed to contentious political threads on here, should apparently be falling over yourself to post one, complete with link, this morning.

    As I said…seems much more of a typical TTR tactic than something you’d usually do, and you can’t have it both ways, but… ‘personal attack’…total tosh.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,610
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    ‘Personal attack’? What rot and it’s not a ‘chink in anyone’s armour’ either.

    It’s a thoroughly unsavoury incident that there may or may not be more to which now needs police investigation.

    You and Tricky seem to have got your respective knickers in a twist over it and it just amused me that you of all people, who is so opposed to contentious political threads on here, should apparently be falling over yourself to post one, complete with link, this morning.

    As I said…seems much more of a typical TTR tactic than something you’d usually do, and you can’t have it both ways, but… ‘personal attack’…total tosh.
    Where as you would normally take a Guardian stance and ignore/sweep it under the carpet. Yet had it been a Tory MP, you'd have been frothing at the mouth and demanding a public execution. QED

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •